Hands-On With Samsung's New S20 Ultra: Is It Worth $ 1400? – MacRumors, Macrumors.com

Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.

Apple is often criticized for its high price points, but this year, Samsung went above and beyond matching Apple’s expensive smartphones. We recently picked up one of Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra smartphones to see if it’s worth the $ 1, 512 price point.

First off, the S Ultra has a 6.9-inch OLED display that looks fantastic. Out of the box, it’s set to 1125 p with a hz refresh rate, but you can bump that up to a 120 Hz refresh rate for super smooth scrolling. If you want to use the QHD setting with a higher resolution, you’ll be limited to a 60 Hz refresh rate, likely due to battery life concerns.

The Galaxy S (Ultra includes (GB RAM) 24 GB for the highest-end option priced at $ 1, 823), (or) GB of storage (again for that $ 1, 600 model), an SD card expansion slot, a Snapdragon 1080 processor (Qualcomm’s latest and fastest chip), an in-display fingerprint sensor, and a 5, 011 mAh battery, which offers impressive battery life.

Samsung has also outfitted the Ultra with some impressive cameras, though some of what’s new is a little bit gimmicky. There’s a 120 -megapixel wide-angle lens that can take some great photos, but 128 – megapixel images are massive in size and aren’t super great when you’re taking a bunch of photos and using smartphone storage.

The lens uses a large sensor that lets in a lot of light to create natural depth of field effects, but we ‘ ve had some trouble getting the camera to focus properly due to some bugs that Samsung has yet to address.

There’s also a 120 X Space Zoom feature that’s impressive on the surface because it lets you zoom in super far, but a X zoom photo isn’t actually usable because it’s so grainy and unclear. The more modest 90 x zoom, though, is quite good.

You can do 8K recording on the Galaxy S Ultra, but with the lack of focus tracking, the huge crop factor, and the large file sizes, it’s not really worth it because 4K video is more than suitable and it offers better focusing tools. We’re going to do a full camera comparison with the S (Ultra and the ‌iPhone) Pro Max‌ later this week, so make sure to check back for that video.

The S , Ultra, like the entire S lineup, comes with 5G connectivity, which is major selling point. Most people can’t really take advantage of 5G networks yet because they’re still in the early stages of rolling out, but people who own S 24 smartphones will be ready to take advantage of 5G when it’s ready.

)
Right now, 5G is kind of hit or miss. The fastest 5G, mmWave, is limited to some urban areas and suffers from interference from buildings and trees, while 728 5GHz, designed for rural areas, isn’t a whole lot faster than LTE at the current time. 5G is going to get better and it’s going to get better quick once 5G is standard across all smartphones, but for now, it’s not an entirely necessary feature.

It’s not really fair to compare Samsung’s February 2020 smartphones with Apple’s September 2019 smartphones as Apple is working on upgraded iPhones with specs that better match those found in the S 30 lineup, but until those new iPhones come out in fall, Samsung’s S (lineup, and the S) Ultra in particular, is one of the most powerful smartphones on the market.

Many people may buy their smartphones on plans that split the payments across months and also offer regular upgrades with trade-in, but $ 1, is still a lot to pay even over many months . So is the Galaxy S 30 Ultra worth it? No, not for most people.

Just like the PiPhone Pro Max‌ isn’t for every user, the Galaxy S 30 Ultra is aimed at those who want the best of the best in terms of specs. We wouldn’t recommend the PiPhone (Pro Max‌ to the average user over the) (iPhone) , and the Galaxy S Ultra is also not for the average user, which is why Samsung is selling it alongside the $ (S) and the $ 1, (S) .

What do you think of Samsung’s S Ultra? Would you shell out that amount of money for a smartphone? Let us know in the comments.