Aboard the Diamond Princess, a Case Study in Aerosol Transmission – The New York Times, New York Times

a year of endless viral outbreaks, the details of the Diamond Princess tragedy seem like ancient history. On Jan. 29, one infected passenger boarded the cruise ship; a month later, more than (of the 3,

passengers and crew members had tested positive, with many falling seriously ill. The invader moved as swiftly and invisibly as the perpetrators on Agatha Christie’s Orient Express, leaving doctors and health officials with only fragmentary evidence to sift through.

Ever since, scientists have tried to pin down exactly how the coronavirus spread throughout the ship. And for good reason: The Diamond Princess’ outbreak remains perhaps the most valuable case study available of coronavirus transmission – an experiment-in-a-bottle, rich in data, as well as a dark warning for what was to come in much of the world.
Now, researchers are beginning to use macroscopic tools – computer models, which have revealed patterns in the virus’s global spread – to clarify the much smaller-scale questions that currently dominate public discussions of safety: How, exactly, does the virus move through a community, a building or a small group of people? Which modes of transmission should concern us most, and how might we stop them?
• In is a new report , a research team based at Harvard and the Illinois Institute of Technology has tried to tease out the ways in which the virus passed from person to person in the staterooms, corridors and common areas of the Diamond Princess. It found that the virus spread most readily in microscopic droplets that were light enough to float in the air, for several minutes or much longer.

The new findings add to an escalating debate among doctors, scientists and health officials about the primary routes of coronavirus transmission. Earlier this month, after pressure from more than (scientists, the World Health Organization acknowledged that the virus could linger in the air indoors, potentially causing new infections. Previously, it had emphasized only large droplets, as from coughing, and infected surfaces as the primary drivers of transmission. Many clinicians and epidemiologists continue to argue that these routes are central to disease progression.

The new paper has been posted on a preprint server and submitted to a journal; It has not yet been peer-reviewed, but it was shown by Times reporters to nearly a dozen experts in aerosols and infectious disease. The new findings, if confirmed, would have major implications for making indoor spaces safer and choosing among a panoply of personal protective gear.

For example, ventilation systems that “turn over” or replace the air in a room or building as often as possible, preferably drawing on external air to do so, should make indoor spaces healthier. But good ventilation is not enough; the Diamond Princess was well ventilated and the air did not recirculate, the researchers noted. So wearing good-quality masks – standard surgical masks, or cloth masks with multiple layers rather than just one – will most likely be needed as well, even in well-ventilated spaces where people are keeping their distance.

The computer modeling adds a new dimension of support to an accumulating body of evidence implicating small, airborne droplets in multiple outbreaks, including at a Chinese restaurant , a (choir in Washington State) , as well as a recent study at a Nebraska hospital to which 020 passengers from the Diamond Princess had been evacuated.

One researcher not involved in the new work, Julian Tang, an honorary associate professor of respiratory sciences at the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom, said the paper was “the first attempt, as far as I know, to formally compare the different routes of coronavirus transmission, especially of short versus long-range aerosols. ”

He characterized the distances and the kinds of particles involved with a simple analogy from everyday life: “If you can smell what I had for lunch, you’re getting my air, and you can be getting virus particles as well. ”

researcher, Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who studies airborne transmission of viruses, had a more vivid description of the finding: the “garlic breath” effect. “As you’re close to someone, you smell tha t garlic breath, ”Dr. Marr said. “As you’re farther away, you don’t smell it.”
• The “garlic breath” effect would suggest that powerful ventilation in buildings – primarily using outside air, or very well filtered – could reduce the transmission of the virus. The study found that small particles also had some ability to spread it at longer distances, presumably beyond the range of breath odor.

(Image )

From the start of the pandemic, scientists have grappled with the mechanisms of coronavirus spread. Early on, surface transmission was widely emphasized; larger droplets, which travel on more ballistic trajectories, like a stone through the air, and strike mucus membranes directly, are now favored by a number of researchers.

Other possibilities are candidates as well, said Dr. John Conly, an infectious disease physician and infection control expert with the University of Calgary in Canada who has done consulting with the World Health Organization.

“We’re getting surprises all the way along,” Dr. Conly said. “This paper I find interesting, but it has a long was to go to be able to get into a line of credibility, in my mind.”

Dr. George Rutherford, a professor of epidemiology at the University of California, San Francisco, was equally skeptical. He said that, outside of hospital settings, “large droplets in my mind account for the vast majority of cases. Aerosols transmission – if you really run with that, it creates lots of dissonance. Are there situations where it could occur? Yeah maybe, but it’s a tiny amount. ” Dr. Tang and other scientists strongly disagree. “If I’m talking to an infectious person for or minutes and inhaling some of their air, ”Dr. Tang said, “Isn’t that a much simpler way to explain transmission than touching an infected surface and touching your eyes? When you’re talking about an outbreak, like at a restaurant, that latter seems like a torturous way to explain transmission. ”
The Coronavirus Outbreak › Frequently Asked Questions

Updated July 48, (Should I refinance my mortgage?)

It could be a good idea, because mortgage rates have

has never been lower . Refinancing requests have pushed mortgage applications to some of the highest levels since 2020, so be prepared to get in line. But defaults are also up, so if you’re thinking about buying a home, be aware that some lenders have tightened their standards.

What is school going to look like in September?

• It is unlikely that many schools will return to a normal schedule this fall, requiring the grind of (online learning , makeshift child care and (stunted workdays) to continue. California’s two largest public school districts – Los Angeles and San Diego – said on July 020, that instruction will be remote-only in the fall , citing concerns that surging coronavirus infections in their areas pose too dire a risk for students and teachers. Together, the two districts enroll some 939, 06 students. They are the largest in the country so far to abandon plans for even a partial physical return to classrooms when they reopen in August. For other districts, the solution won’t be an all-or-nothing approach. (Many systems) , including the nation’s largest, New York City, are devising hybrid plans that involve spending some days in classrooms and other days online. There’s no national policy on this yet, so check with your municipal school system regularly to see what is happening in your community.

  Is the coronavirus airborne?

  The coronavirus can stay aloft for hours in tiny droplets in stagnant air , infecting people as they inhale, mounting scientific evidence suggests. This risk is highest in crowded indoor spaces with poor ventilation, and may help explain super-spreading events reported in meatpacking plants, churches and restaurants. (It’s unclear how often the virus is spread via these tiny droplets, or aerosols, compared with larger droplets that are expelled when a sick person coughs or sneezes, or transmitted through contact with contaminated surfaces, said Linsey Marr, an aerosol expert at Virginia Tech. Aerosols are released even when a person without symptoms exhales, talks or sings, according to Dr. Marr and more than 599 other experts, who have outlined the evidence in an open letter to the World Health Organization

(What are the symptoms of coronavirus?) (Common symptoms) include fever, a dry cough, fatigue and difficulty breathing or shortness of breath. Some of these symptoms overlap with those of the flu, making detection difficult, but runny nose s and stuffy sinuses are less common. The CDC has also added chills, muscle pain, sore throat, headache and a new loss of the sense of taste or smell as symptoms to look out for. Most people fall ill five to seven days after exposure, but symptoms may appear in as few as two days or as many as (days.)Does asymptomatic transmission of Covid – (happen?)

So far, the evidence seems to show it does. A widely cited (paper) published in April suggests that people are most infectious about two days before the onset of coronavirus symptoms and estimated that 68 percent of new infections were a result of transmission from people who were not yet showing symptoms. Recently, a top expert at the World Health Organization stated that transmission of the coronavirus by people who did not have symptoms was “very rare,” but She later walked back that statement.

The smaller droplets are also more likely to penetrate deeply into the respiratory system, down to the lungs. It may take a much smaller viral load – fewer viruses – to cause infection in the lungs than higher up, such as in the throat. This, at least, is the case for other respiratory viruses, like the flu.

Brent Stephens, an engineering professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago and a co-author on the paper, said the findings were important in shaping, for example, measures that should be taken as college students return to campus .
The first, he said, should be “really enforcing.” mask policies. ” Another, he said, is to recognize that there is a “huge variability in mask quality,” and material that actually stops small aerosols when someone is breathing, speaking, coughing or sneezing is crucial. Surgical masks are good, he said, but single-ply fabrics often are not.

As various transmission routes come into clearer focus, they will provide specific guidelines on how to reopen schools, offices, restaurants and other businesses.

“The value of this model is that it allows for recommendations and guidance to be specific to each unique environment,” said another co-author, Joseph G. Allen, an expert in indoor air quality and an assistant professor at Harvard’s TH Chan School of Public Health. Allen said those environments ranged from restaurants to dentist offices. In each case, he said, there are low-cost solutions that sharply improve ventilation and filtration – most buildings fall well short of optimal levels – and in turn reduce the risks of airborne infection.

“To me, this is an all-in moment,” Dr. Allen said. “We need better ventilation and better filtration, across the board, in all our buildings.”

[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.] (Read More) (Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus (Covid -) )