Boris Johnson 'could face prison time' if he breaks law in pursuit of no-deal Brexit – The Independent, Independent

Boris Johnsonis heading for prison if he breaks the law and defies parliament by still pursuing ano-deal Brexit, says a former top prosecutor.

The prime minister will be in “contempt of court” and will face the same punishment as any other citizen, Lord MacDonald, the formerdirector of public prosecutions, warned.

He said a court would order that “the law should be followed” if, as expected,parliament passes legislation on Mondayto force Mr Johnson to seek an extension toArticle 50and avert a crash-out on 31 October.

“A refusal in the face of that would amount to contempt of court which could find that person in prison,” Lord MacDonald said.

It would not be an “extreme outcome” as it is “convention” that anyone who refuses to “purge their contempt” is sent to prison, he said.

However, the cross-bench peer said, it was also possible that a court could order another figure in government to sign the letter asking the EU for the delay.

The warning comes after Mr Johnsonvowed to lie “dead in a ditch”before asking Brussels for the extension and said the law about to be passed would only force him to request the delay “in theory”. ******                                                                                                                                                                                                      

David Lidington, the former de facto deputy prime minister, has suggested the prime minister would be helping the rise of strong-arm, populist leaders, who would seize on events in the UK to make the case for their abuses of democracy.

Meanwhile, MPs fighting a no-dealBrexitare lining up a legal team to prepare to go to court to compel Mr Johnson to comply.

Lord Sumption, a formerSupreme Courtjudge also speaking toSky News, agreed there would be “plenty of ways” to enforce the law.

MPs opposed to no deal could apply for an injunction ordering Mr Johnson to authorize a delay, after which – if he refused to comply – a judge could order an official to sign off the extension “in place of the prime minister” .

However, the author and historian argued it was unlikely to get to that point, as senior civil servants would refuse to cooperate with a prime minister who was wilfully breaking the law.

“He won’t get any cooperation, apart from the fanatics around him… the attorney general won’t sit there quietly while this happens,” Lord Sumption said.

“If he was to do something as foolish as that, he would be on his own, maybe accompanied by (Dominic Cummings) , ”He argued.

The controversy was fuelled as groups of pro- and anti-Brexit protesters clashed on Parliament Square.

About 200 People joined a pro-Brexit demonstration organized by the Democratic Football Lads Alliance (DFLA) outside the Houses of Parliament.

When members of the anti-Brexit group March for Change began to set up for a rally of their own, some members of the DFLA approached and began shouting.

A beer can was thrown towards about 10 people from the March for Change protest, before police on horseback intervened.