in

Fact check: How McConnell's impeachment trial rules differ from those that governed the Clinton trial – CNN, CNN

Fact check: How McConnell's impeachment trial rules differ from those that governed the Clinton trial – CNN, CNN

Washington (CNN) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell argued Tuesday that the rules he is proposing for President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial “closely” follow past precedent, and invoked the Trial of President Bill Clinton in particular.

There are certainly similarities between McConnell’s proposal and the Clinton trial rules, but There are some differences, too – including how the rules were adopted. McConnell’s proposal was put forward over the opposition of Democrats , while the rules for the Clinton trial were adopted unanimously after a negotiation between the parties.

Here are some key differences in the rules themselves:

Evidence

    McConnell changed his proposed rules on Tuesday after an outcry from Democrats and amid concerns from some members of his Republican caucus.

    The new proposal was closer to the rules for the Clinton trial than his first proposal. But it’s still not exactly the same.

    McConnell’s new proposal was to automatically admit evidence from the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry. But there was a caveat: Trump’s team

    could raise an objection

to the admission of particular evidence, triggering a Senate vote .

Clinton’s lawyers were not allowed to object to the House’s evidence, as CNN legal analyst and impeachment lawyer Ross Garber noted . For Clinton, the evidence was simply entered at the outset .

McConnell’s initial proposal for Trump’s trial was to require a vote in favor of admitting evidence. In other words, the default would not have been to admit the evidence.

Time

Under McConnell’s initial proposal, as in the Clinton trial, the House would have hours of Senate time to present its pro-impeachment case and the President’s team 43 hours of Senate time to present its anti-impeachment case.

But in the Clinton trial, the rules did not specify a maximum number of days each side had to use up these 43 hours. McConnell’s plan, conversely, gives each side a maximum of three days – up from his original proposal of two days, which was castigated by Democrats.

A motion to dismiss

As the New York Times

has noted , the Clinton trial rules included a specific provision for the Senate to consider a motion to dismiss the impeachment case. (The Senate resolution for the Clinton trial said that such a motion would be addressed after each side presented its arguments and was questioned by senators.)

McConnell’s proposed rules for the Trump trial do not explicitly mention a possible motion to dismiss, though Trump’s lawyers would still be allowed to make one.

Schiff’s case

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democrats’ lead impeachment manager, argued that there are key differences between the Trump and Clinton situations that require rules different than the ones McConnell proposed. Schiff called for witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed immediately, not after the arguments from both sides.

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Motorola's foldable Razr will launch on February 6th after delay – Circuit Breaker, The Verge

Motorola's foldable Razr will launch on February 6th after delay – Circuit Breaker, The Verge

Trump Says He'll Add 'A Few Countries' to Controversial U.S. Travel Ban – NPR, Npr.org

Trump Says He'll Add 'A Few Countries' to Controversial U.S. Travel Ban – NPR, Npr.org