in ,

“Grassroots” anti-Amazon nonprofit turns out to be retailer astroturfing, Ars Technica

“Grassroots” anti-Amazon nonprofit turns out to be retailer astroturfing, Ars Technica


    

      astroturf –

             

Competitors are throwing everything at the wall to slow the Amazon juggernaut.

      

          –

  

        

The Amazon logo at the entrance of a logistics center in France, July 2019.

Enlarge/The Amazon logo at the entrance of a logistics center in France, July 2019.

It’s no secret that retailers who compete with Amazon for consumer dollarswant regulators to take a closer lookat the way their titanic, globe- spanning rival works. They’ve openly said so, many times. And yet, three major firms reportedly spent a great deal of time and effort obscuring their ties to a nonprofit that exists to rally support against Amazon.

The nonprofit, called theFree and Fair Markets Initiative, describes itself as “a nonprofit watchdog committed to scrutinizing Amazon’s harmful practices and promoting a fair, modern marketplace that works for all Americans. ” According toa new report todayfrom The Wall Street Journal, however, the group is funded by rivals, including Walmart, Oracle, and mall-owner Simon, who all have a strong financial interest in dethroning Amazon.

All three are competing fiercely with Amazon in their own market sectors. Walmart, the nation’s biggest big-box store, competes in retail, selling goods and groceries. Oracle competes in Internet services and has been fighting against Amazon, for example, to securea $ 10 billion government contract. And Simon, the country largest mall owner, is at the front and center of theretail apocalypseand all thedead mallsthat retail bankruptcies leave in their wake.

FFMI declined to answer questions from the WSJ about its funders, backing, or structure, instead providing the newspaper with a statement saying that it is, “focusing on the substantive issues and putting a spotlight on the way companies like Amazon undermine the public good — something that media outlets, activists, and politicians in both parties are also doing with increasing frequency.”

Astroturf, covering up real concerns

Alliances and coalitions form all the time to agitate against something likea major merger, but the Journal notes that it is ” rare “for an entire nonprofit group” to be created for the sole purpose of going after a single firm, “calling the formation of FFMI,” an indication of the degree to which competing companies have coalesced to counter the growing and accumulated power of Amazon and how far competitors are increasingly willing to go to counter-strike. “

But while FFMI might be as fake a “grassroots” organization as ever there was, the growing opposition to Amazon is very real . Genuine nonprofits, such as the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, have ayears-long historyof opposition to Amazon’s tactics. Community activism in New York City led Amazon toscrap its plansto open a secondary headquarters office location in Queens. And retail trade groups haveopenly pushedfor federal regulators to launch antitrust investigations against the company. Dozens of media reports in recent months have also highlighted privacy and competition issues with Amazon’sAlexavoice assistant, (Ring) home surveillance business, andin-house logistics and deliverybusiness.

The pressure, it seems, is working. The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission areboth working onbig tech antitrust investigations, focusing on Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. Congress is alsodigging into the way all four companies use their market powerand recently asked for amassive trove of documentationfrom the company about its business practices.

Amazon also faces several antitrust investigations overseas:Germany,Austria,Italy, and the (European Union) all have separate probes in progress.

                                 

                  

Brave Browser
(Read More)
Payeer

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

The longer it has taken, the longer it will take, Hacker News

Epic seems to have paid $ 10.5 million for Control’s PC exclusivity, Ars Technica

Epic seems to have paid $ 10.5 million for Control’s PC exclusivity, Ars Technica