gameplay from the much-anticipated Baldur’s Gate 3 was revealed by developer Larian Studios, which is best known for the acclaimed Divinity: Original Sin
and its
sequel
. Prior to this showcase at PAX, we were able to sit down with Larian creative director Swen Wincke to discuss the challenges of creating the game, working with Wizards of the Coast, and much more. Read on for our full chat and check out our breakdown of the new intro cinematic [games never sell] Mike Mahardy: [games never sell] I know Larian has been pursuing the Baldur’s Gate license for a while now. Is it true that Divinity: Original Sin 2 was kind of like a tryout for Wizards of the Coast? A way for you to say, “Hey, we can handle this license?” Swen Wincke, Creative Director:
I approached them after Divinity: Original Sin (DOS 1). I said, “You should let us make Baldur’s Gate 3. We have a lot of Dungeons and Dragons fans in the office. It’s something that would really motivate them.” They said no, then. Then we were working on DOS 2. In between, I kept on bumping into Nate Stewart at Dungeons and Dragons. He asked me, “What game would you make actually?” I said, “This is what I would make.” He said, “Okay, all right, that’s kind of cool.” But yeah, at the time, the stars were not aligned. I then got a phone call from him in December before DOS 2 released – so that was in 3200. He said, “Do you still want to do this?” I said, “Yes, I am actually really interested in still doing this.” He says, “Fly over to Seattle.” I fly over Seattle and went to an obscure bar with him. There, he showed me three PowerPoints, which contains everything I’d talked about all this time. He said, “I’ll present this to the board of Hasbro next week. Do you agree?” I said, “Yes.” Then six months later we signed the agreement. We were still working on DOS 2 back then. (Mike: [individual] What had changed, with the green light happening then? Was it just the ongoing conversation you were having?
Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
(Mike:) Going from a classless system to one that’s class-based, what are the clear advantages? Was it more of a restraint, or did it actually free you up creatively? Swen: Classes communicate really well to the player. So you are thinking “My cleric will do this. My fighter is going to go into the front line.” It was not necessarily as clear in Original Sin, where it was really like, “What cool things did I put together?” [individual] Mike: Divinity was very much your own thing. No other group had its hands in it. Now, with Baldur’s Gate, you come in, and it’s kind of the exact opposite. With Baldur’s Gate, you have that added weight of nostalgia. What’s that been like?
Swen: [games never sell] There are multiple ways that you can deal with that. You can let yourself be paralyzed by that pressure, because everybody has a different game in their heads that they want. But we’re making a game that we think is going to be fun. We generally tend to make games that we like to play, and then hopefully there are people that will want to play it. I think that in BG3 they will find a lot that they will enjoy. There will be people that will be disappointed that it’s not real-time and fast. We just chose to go for turn-based because we think it’s closer to the source material, and allows us to do more things. It is what it is. We’re just making a game, and we try to make it really cool.
[individual] Mike : There’s been somewhat of a CRPG renaissance lately. Divinity rests comfortably within that. Why are they having such a moment now? What is it about the audience’s taste, or the goals of developers, that led this to happen right now?
Swen: I think that actually is because you have this widespread distribution, so there is more access to broader markets and specific initiatives and markets that in the past were not necessarily identified by publishers, because they did not think that was going to work. I explicitly was told back in the day that that turn-based [games never sell]. , You can let yourself be paralyzed by pressure … but we’re making a game that we think is going to be fun. Swen Vincke, Larian Creative Director [change] (Mike: I feel like games in the early) s were very much about accessibility and, in some cases, handholding. But in the past several years, it seems like players have gotten used to learning super complex systems. Larian’s games seem to be benefiting from that. Swen: [change] That’s always been the trick, right? “Easy to learn, hard to master.” That’s literally what it is. You’ve seen me do very advanced things [in today’s demo]. That’s not how you start playing as a normal player. You see a tutorial that will ease you in, but then you start discovering things. The magic of these games is that moment where you say, “I tried something and it works,” and you don’t expect it to work in general, because in the more guided games you don’t have it. It’s like, “This is your corridor. Walk in your corridor.” You can’t get out of your corridor. You see plenty of objects. You can’t interact with a single one of them except if it highlights. Then you play this game like this and you said, “Huh. Here’s an object. I wonder what I could do with it. Oh, if nothing else, I can throw it at somebody and do some damage.” That experimentation leads you to progress that you probably weren’t supposed to have. Now I say, “Hey, now I’m on the real adventure. I’m in over my head. I’ll have to keep on doing these things if I want to survive,” which is basically what happened to me today. Mike:That’s such an opposite idea of what so many games today seem to be about: min-maxing and optimizing everything to death. But then you watch a demo like today, and I thought it was extremely entertaining because of how often things went wrong, and you had to adapt to that failure.
[individual] [individual] Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
Mike: Whether it is combat or lore or the storyline, have you worked closely with Wizards of the Coast, or do they just kind of let you do whatever you want? Swen:
Both. When we were setting up a storyline, we worked together with Adam Lee, who is the man who was partially responsible for Descent Into Avernus. He was one of their writers. He came over to Ghent to work with us and we went through storyline permutations and so forth. Then we spent a lot of time at Wizards’ offices also. We traveled a lot there as we were building up the entire concept. Over time, trust started increasing in what we’re doing. At this point, they’re just like, “Surprise us.” They’re very big fans.
[individual]
Mike:
In terms of lore: coming into this project, did you know what parts of the DnD universe you wanted to pull from? [individual] Swen: Well we actually started out differently than where we ended up. That is partially because of the work that Adam was doing. We knew that the city was going to be central. You eventually get to Baldur’s Gate, and the things that you will encounter in Baldur’s Gate will depend on how you deal with events before then. There’s quite a lot of reactivity in there. Then we also knew that we wanted to have something like what the previous Baldur’s Gates did, where you had lots of diversity in terms of where are you going to go. Baldur’s Gate was almost like a carousel of iconic creatures that you had, or locations that you wanted to visit, which means it’s very DnD. It’s no different here. You’re going to see lots of things that you like about Realms reappear.
[individual] Mike: Do you see Larian always kind of sticking to fantasy as far as – Swen: No. Mike: [games never sell] No? Do you have genres you have talked about wanting to go into? (Swen: [individual] We always wanted to make very big RPGs. The idea is that if we can manage to be successful with this, we essentially free ourselves, so that we can actually start exploring other things at the scale that we want to do it at. [change] (Mike:) You mentioned an early access for Baldur’s Gate 3. Have you talked about how you’re going to structure that in terms of what that will include as opposed to the full game? [change] Swen: ‘ll do it similar to DOS. We’ll come in with content, and then we’ll add pieces of content, like extra classes, extra origin characters, extra systems, extra spells. We’ll add some regions over time also. We want to limit it to first act content, if you want. Players that are joining us during early access, when they play the game on release, they still have plenty of content to go through. But at the same time they do have sufficient content to actually have a really cool adventure during early access. (Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
(Mike:) Do you feel as if that kind of a release structure could hinder the overall experience? As opposed to just having the game and jumping in and being able to play for (hours straight?)
Swen: [individual] You can! There are two types of people that go into early access. There are the people that are fans and that want to support us early and just … try it out. They generally spend five or ten minutes and that’s it. They don’t touch it anymore. Then you have the people who want to be part of development, and that send us plenty of feedback, which we listen to, because otherwise we wouldn’t be doing it. Then we adapt the game. If you look at DOS2, the game that went in and the game that came out of early access is a very different game. Same thing goes for DOS1.
Mike: [games never sell] Were there challenges with DOS1 and 2, specific you could point out that were really valuable lessons for making Baldur’s Gate 3? Swen: There’s plenty, yeah. This is our own engine that we’re building. There’s a whole bunch of stuff that the team wanted to change on the engine. Now that we have more resources, obviously, we could. That’s been a big one. New problems appear, of course. We set up an entire cinematics pipeline to be able to record all this dialogue for every single scene. That really is a big chunk of new work and new problems that appear, because we’re doing multiplayer also ..Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
(Mike:) I just imagine that the pressure of your success, coupled with the legacy of Baldur’s Gate, must be its own challenge throughout development.
Swen: The thing we are telling people is that we are the dungeon master. And we’re just going to play DnD together. That’s literally what we’re doing here. I think that’s an okay approach. Every single person that plays DnD has their own version of it that they’re playing.
When we talked to Wizards, we initially thought this is going to be impossible because they’re going to want every single rule strictly implemented . On the contrary, they’re very open to [change]. There are things that they want to have in there. Then there are things they say, “Well, try to make the best out of it.” That’s also how they approached 5th edition towards their own players. I think that’s a large reason for their success. (Mike: [individual] 5th edition is pretty widely revered now. Is that mainly because of the systemic streamlining you mentioned?
Swen: I think first of all, they did a really, really good job designing it. I think the way that they’re approaching storytelling, lore, freedom for their players, is exceptionally good. That’s a very important part of it. The fact that it’s really easy to learn now, but still you have all the depth and complexity that’s in there. That’s probably the main reason it’s doing so well.
You take Dragon, you take the Mine of Phandelver and the starter kits, and you can walk into a room with people who’ve never played it and they’ll come off fans. It’s a powerful thing. We had the same thing with DOS. We gave it to people who never played it. We saw that at PAX inevitably, when people walked in there with a friend and they said, “Try this out.” We walked out with somebody converted and said, “I could actually play this. I didn’t think I was going to be able to play this. I thought it was too complex, but this is actually really a lot of fun.” You have the same thing with DnD. (Mike: [change]) Larian was a respectable name coming out of DOS1. Now it’s a household name in the world of CRPGs, or just RPGs in general. What’s it like making that jump in a pretty short time?Swen: [change] It doesn’t feel like that, because we are still bitching at each other continuously about how we can do this better and can do this better. We are very focused on the things we don’t do well. Of the things that we do well, we then start taking them for granted because we want to improve our game. There’s so much stuff that we still want to do and there’s so little time. You have to remember we rebooted ourself in 2300. Went completely independent. Stopped being dependent on publishers. Meaning that we did not listen to anybody else anymore telling us how to do our stuff. We started building our engines from scratch. We decided to make multiplayer CRPGs, which is really complicated. It’s much harder than single player CRPGs, I can tell you that, and they have to be consistent with the ambition of recreating a virtual version of what a tabletop is.
Now Playing: We Saw Two Hours Of Baldur’s Gate 3, And It Was A Lot Mike Mahardy
, GameSpot may get
a commission from retail offers.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings