in

I was told Trump wanted quid pro quo deal, Ukraine ambassador reportedly testifies – live – The Guardian, Theguardian.com

I was told Trump wanted quid pro quo deal, Ukraine ambassador reportedly testifies – live – The Guardian, Theguardian.com


Democrats say Bill Taylor testomony signals ‘sea change’ in impeachment inquiry

Bill Taylor’s testimony – which contradicts claims by the president, his chief of staff and his and his associates – “is a sea change” said Democratic representative Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts. “I think it could accelerate matters,” he said.

Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida said: “I do not know how you would listen to today’s testimony from Ambassador Taylor and come to any other (conclusion) except that the president abused his power and withheld foreign aid ”

Meanwhile, other Democrats, including those running for president, have reiterated their support for a speedy impeachment.

Elizabeth Warren(@ ewarren)

I’ll say it again: This is corruption, plain and simple. Donald Trump must be impeached.https://t.co/ZZH4J3DY0t

October 22, 2019

Updated

That’s it from me today. My west coast colleague, Maanvi Singh, will take over the blog for the next few hours.

Here’s where the day stands so far:

  • Bill Taylor, the acting US ambassador to Ukraine, testified in HouseDemocrats’impeachment inquiry that he was toldTrumpwas holding up military aid to Ukraine until the country president publicly announced investigations intoJoe Bidenand the (election – contradicting Trump’s repeated denials of a quid pro quo.)
  • Trump sparked outrage by comparing the impeachment inquiry to a “lynching.”
  • The anonymous author of a 2018 New York Times op-ed who claimed to be part of an internal White House “resistance” to Trump is now writing a book while maintaining anonymity.
  • Russia has won joint control of formerly Kurdish territory in Syria, marking a crucial victory forVladimir Putinafter the withdrawal of US troops.
  • The UK parliament rejected Prime Minister Boris Johnson ‘s proposal to fast-trackBrexit, virtually guaranteeing that Britain will not leave the EU by its set deadline at the end of the month. (Follow the Guardian’sUK politics live blogfor more.)

Maanvi will have more on the news of the day, so stay tuned.

Bill Tayloralso said in his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment that a National Security Council official,Tim Morrison

, had offered a less than glowing assessment ofTrump‘s call with the Ukrainian president .

The acting US ambassador toUkrainesaid: “Mr. Morrison told me that the call ‘could have been better’ and that President Trump had suggested that PresidentZelensky(Y) or his staff meet with Mr.Giulianiand Attorney GeneralWilliam Barr. I did not see any official readout of the call until it was publicly released on September 25. ”

Morrison’s opinion is a far cry from Trump’s repeated assertions that his call with the Ukrainian president was “perfect” and included nothing improper.

A Washington Post reporter summarized the opening statement of (Bill Taylor, the acting US ambassador toUkraine, in this way:

Matt Viser(@ mviser)

Shorter Bill Taylor: President Trump insisted, over and over there was not a “quid pro quo.” But there was a quid. Followed by a pro. And then, finally, a quo.

October , 2019

Sondland said ‘everything,’ including military aid, tied to investigations, Taylor testifies

According to the opening statement ofBill Taylor,Gordon Sondlandsaid that “everything,” including the release of military aid toUkraine, was tied to the country president publicly announcing investigations into (Joe Biden) and the 2016 election.

Taylor, the acting US ambassador to Ukraine, said to the House committees investigating impeachment: “Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with PresidentZelenskyywas dependent on a public announcement of investigations – in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.

“He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”

Taylor says he was planning to resign if Ukraine aid not released

Bill Taylorsaid in his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment that he was preparing to resign in August over the delaying of military aid toUkraine.

The acting US ambassador to Ukraine said that he had a conversation on August 22 withTim Morrisonof the National Security Council. Morrison indicated during the phone call thatTrumpwas opposed to authorizing any military aid to Ukraine.

Taylor said: “As I had told Secretary[Mike] Pompeoin May, if the policy of strong support for Ukraine were to change, I would have to resign. Based on my call with Mr. Morrison, I was preparing to do so. ”

In his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment,Bill Taylorsaid he was told by an official at the National Security Council thatTrumphad insisted the Ukrainian president himself publicly announce a probe intoJoe Bidenand his son.

The acting US ambassador toUkrainesaid: “President Trump did insist that PresidentZelenskygo to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 election interference, and that President Zelensky should want to do this himself. ”

However, Taylor said that Trump had toldGordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the EU, he was not seeking a “ quid pro quo, ”even as military aid to Ukraine hung in the balance.

At the risk of stating the obvious: if Trump demanded that the Ukrainian president make public announcements of investigations intoDemocratsbefore he would authorize the release of military aid, then his actions were the very definition of a quid pro quo.

Taylor expressed concerns about Giuliani’s role in Ukraine

Bill Taylorsaid in his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment that he was concerned before accepting the role of acting US Ambassador toUkraineaboutRudy Giuliani‘s role in the country.

The longtime diplomat said: “I worried about what I had heard concerning the role of Rudolph Giuliani, who made several high-profile statements about Ukraine and U.S. policy toward the country.

“So during my meeting with Secretary[Mike] Pompeoon May 28, I made clear to him and the others present that if US policy toward Ukraine changed, he would not want me posted there and I could not stay. ”

After accepting the role, Taylor said he realized that Giuliani – along withKurt Volker,Gordon SondlandandRick Perry– controlled “an irregular, informal channel of US policy-making with respect to Ukraine. ”

Taylor said: “Although this irregular channel was well-connected in Washington, it operated mostly outside of official State Department channels.”

Taylor stands by text message in which he called potential quid pro quo ‘crazy’

The Washington Posthas publisheda copy ofBill Taylor‘s opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment.

In the 15 – page statement, the acting US ambassador toUkraineand longtime civil servant describes how he became “increasingly concerned” that the US-Ukraine relationship was being “fundamentally undermined” by withholding military aid for “domestic political reasons.”

Taylor added that he stood by his Sept. 9 text message toGordon SondlandandKurt Volker, in which he said it would be “crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”

It remains unknown whether the seniorTrump administrationofficial who is writing a book about being part of an internal “resistance” is still employed by the White House.

Eamon Javers(@ EamonJavers)

This is certainly unprecedented, but one key question is unanswered: is this person STILL in the Administration? A White House official declined to comment on the news of the book, or to speculate on the identity of Anonymous.https://t.co/LUPRFkE 785

(October) , 2019

According toCNN, the literary agency representing the author declined to comment on whether the person still worked in the administration.

Anonymous ‘resistance’ op-ed author penning book

Here’s another piece of news that the president will surely hate: The anonymous author of a 2018 New York Times op-ed that described a “resistance” inside the government to help controlTrumpis now writing a book.

The Washington Postreports:

The book, titled, ‘A WARNING,’ is being promoted as ‘an unprecedented behind-the-scenes portrait of the Trump presidency’ that expands upon the Times column, which ricocheted around the world and stoked the president’s rage because of its devastating portrayal of Trump in office.

The column described Trump’s leadership style as’ impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective, ‘and noted that’ his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and sometimes reckless decisions that have to be walked back … ‘…

The forthcoming book will list the author as ‘Anonymous.’ Although the person does not reveal their identity in the book, they will discuss the reasons for their anonymity, according to people involved in the project.

Taylor reportedly contradicts Sondland’s testimony

Bill Taylor, the acting US ambassador toUkraine, reportedly directly contradicted the testimony ofGordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the EU, in his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment.

John Hudson(@ John_Hudson)

Wow ->Bill Taylor’s testimony totally contradicts Amb. Sondland’s claim that he recalls “no discussions” with anyone at the State Department or White House about Biden or his son. Taylor says Sondland heard about Biden directly from Trump:https://t.co/mkmJWgSbjzpic.twitter.com/7xXzBJAd5E

(October) , 2019

Several HouseDemocratsinvolved in the investigation are already calling for Sondland to be called back to testify and answer for the discrepancies between the two men’s accounts.

Manu Raju(@ mkraju)

Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch said there were “inconsistencies” in testimony and “factual assertions.”

“I would be extremely surprised and dumbfounded if Chairman Schiff didn’t ask for him to come back, ”Lynch told me, referring to Sondland.
https://t.co / Si2gXP6neO

October 22, 2019

Taylor reportedly says he was told military aid was contingent upon public announcement of investigations

Bill Taylor, the acting US ambassador to Ukraine, said in his opening statement to the House committees investigating impeachment that he was told military aid toUkrainewas contingent upon public announcements of investigations intoDemocrats,according to the Washington Post.

The PostReports:

Upon arriving in Kyiv last spring he became alarmed by secondary diplomatic channels involving U.S. officials that he called ‘weird,’ Taylor said, according to a copy of his lengthy opening statement obtained by The Washington Post.

Taylor walked lawmakers through a series of conversations he had with other U.S. diplomats who were trying to obtain what one called the ‘deliverable’ of Ukrainian help investigating Trump’s political rivals.

Taylor said he spoke to AmbassadorGordon Sondland, the US envoy to the European Union.

‘During that phone call, Amb. Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President[Volodymyr] Zelenskyto state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, ‘Taylor said in the statement.

Former Vice PresidentJoe Biden‘s son Hunter had been a board member of Burisma, a large Ukrainian gas company.

McConnell says he and Trump never discussed Ukraine call, contradicting the president

Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, denied ever telling (Trump) that hisUkrainecall was “perfect,” as the president has claimed. Asked whether Trump was lying, the Kentucky Republican replied: “You’d have to ask him.”

Nancy Cordes(@ nancycordes)

A couple weeks ago,@ realDonaldTrumpsaid that@ senatemajldrtold him that his call w / President Zelensky was “perfect” and “Innocent”. But when I asked McConnell about that just now, he said he never spoke to the President about it. So was Trump lying? “You’d have to ask him.”

(October) , 2019

McConnell also offered some muted criticism of Trump’s use of the word “lynching” to describe HouseDemocrats‘impeachment inquiry, calling it “an unfortunate choice of words.”

NBC News(@ NBCNews)

Senate Majority Leader McConnell on President Trump’s comparison of the impeachment effort against him to “a lynching”:

“Given the history in our country, I would not compare this to a lynching. That was an unfortunate choice of words. ”pic.twitter.com/3zEDZzwv9y

(October) , 2019

Brave Browser
Read More
Payeer

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Beijing draws up plan to replace Carrie Lam as Hong Kong chief – Financial Times, Financial Times

Beijing draws up plan to replace Carrie Lam as Hong Kong chief – Financial Times, Financial Times

Bill Belichick’s Macabre Dismantling of Adam Gase’s Brain Proves He’s an Evil Football W …, Crypto Coins News

Bill Belichick’s Macabre Dismantling of Adam Gase’s Brain Proves He’s an Evil Football W …, Crypto Coins News