Los Angeles, California, voters report problems with new machines, Recode

  

New voting machines making their debut on Super Tuesday in Los Angeles County are already raising concerns about unreliable technology . While the system is meant to modernize voting and make democracy more accessible, some voters are complaining about technical glitches and usability. That’s not great news, since LA represents a massive election district in the state with the most delegates up for grabs in the Democratic primary.

Today, the Los Angeles Times reported that election officials were having issues with their systems linking up with California’s voter database, which meant that the registration system was not tracking who had already voted or incorporating new registration information. This is a big problem, since California passed a law last year that allows for voter registration on election day in an effort to enfranchise more voters.

Meanwhile, many voters have complained on Twitter that their voting machines weren’t working, with some reaching out to (election officials on the platform for help. There were also complaints that the machines were not taking voters’ paper ballots, which need to be inserted back into the machine . Several people also said that the e-poll books weren’t working.

Jennifer Cohn, an attorney and election integrity advocate, aggregated at least

social media or news reports related to the new voting system. They’re all bad. The reported failures are especially discouraging because they represent

a $ million effort to modernize LA’s elections

. The new voting machines are part of LA’s Voting Solutions for All People (VSAP) and come equipped with touchscreens and futuristic-looking yellow-and-black stands. The system even allows voters to fill out their ballots ahead of time on other devices and then send that information to the voting machines through a

QR code . Importantly, all votes are meant to be backed up with a paper record, which is designed to be a fail-safe should go technically awry with the system.

VSAP is publicly owned and designed to use open source technology, making the program the first of its kind in the nation. The machines themselves arrive with another new change in LA: Instead of local polling stations, people can now vote from anywhere in the county, thanks to a centralized voter database . Some voting machines are even being moved around the Los Angeles area, which should make it easier for less-mobile populations to vote .

It’s all supposed to be high tech, but the system has been showing some low-tech flaws since it debuted earlier this year. In late February, during California’s early voting period, CBS reported that some of the new voting machines were going unused because of issues with equipment, and that about out of 823 Total locations did not open on time because of issues with the tech.

At that time, the system had already raised security and usability concerns. Even Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat whose district covers parts of West LA,

complained on Twitter that users wouldn’t see all candidates available for each race without clicking a “more” button, which could inadvertently lead some voters to believe that their first-choice candidate isn’t an available option, especially in a crowded race.

Days earlier, Lieu and two other California representatives released a statement , saying that the “current situation is not acceptable and inadequate measures have been taken to remedy this serious flaw. ” That same issue had also motivated Beverly Hills to sue LA County in January in an effort to get a handful of changes made to the new voting machines.

Recode reached out to Smartmatic, the company that helped design the system, which declined to comment, as well as to the Los Angeles County Registrar, which did not respond by the time of publication.

It’s not clear how widespread these problems are, but they fit into a Worrisome trend in which new US voting tech comes with technical flaws or is just plain difficult to use. Already, the caucuses in Nevada

and

Iowa have raised concerns about whether our tech is being properly tested before elections. And these issues come amid broader concerns about the integrity of US elections infrastructure and worries of foreign interference.

Of course, we may not be prepared for every possible way Russia might try to hack our elections, but basic technical usability flaws – like the ones we’re now seeing in LA’s voting machines – probably aren’t helping our cause.

(Open Sourced)

is made possible by the Omidyar Network. All Open Sourced content is editorially independent and produced by our journalists.

(Help Open Sourced’s reporting)