Newspaper faces legal action from Duchess of Sussex for publishing excerpts from a letter to her father
.************************** (******************************** (**********************************) ******************************** (**************************************** (****************************************The Mail on Sunday say that Thomas Markle had the right to publicly defend himself and exercise his right to freedom of speech by making the letter public. Photograph: Reuters (******************************************
Thomas Markle could be called to give evidence at the high court against his estranged daughter Meghan, as part of her ongoing legal action against the (Mail on Sunday********************, after it emerged that the paper’s defense appears to rely on his account.
The Duchess of Sussex is suing the newspaper
for breach of copyright, invasion of privacy, and misuse of personal data after it published excerpts from a letter she sent her father complaining about how he was treating her.
The Mail on Sunday filed its defense at the high court on Tuesday, arguing that the duchess and other royals “rely on publicity about themselves and their lives to maintain the privileged positions they hold” and that she could not “Have a reasonable expectation of privacy that the contents of the letter were private and would remain so.”
They said there is a “huge and legitimate public interest” in the private lives of the royals and would defend the case, which comes as the royal family struggles with the question of how to disentangle Prince Harry and his wife from public life (**********************************.
Among the evidence disclosed in the court papers are highly personal text messages between Thomas Markle and his daughter in the run-up to her wedding in May 2018.
The Mail on Sunday’s defense dismissed the copyright claim by arguing the letter was not an original literary work, while suggesting that Meghan allowed her friends to brief the American celebrity magazine People on her behalf in February 2019. Among the claims made by People was that the Duchess had sent her father a “loving” letter six months earlier.
In response the Mail on Sunday has argued that Thomas Markle had the right to publicly defend himself and exercise his right to freedom of speech by making the letter public and giving an interview to defend himself against the briefing in People . They say he only decided to release the letter after being hurt by how it was characterized and claim that Meghan expected it to be made public.
“Thomas Markle had a weighty right to tell his version of what had happened between himself and his daughter including the contents of the letter. She did not suggest that they try to repair their relationship.
“Except for the receipt of the letter, Mr Markle had not heard from his daughter since he wrote to tell her he was too ill to attend her wedding, nor has he ever been introduced to or met Prince Harry
or their son, his grandson, ”the court documents said .
The Mail on Sunday also suggested that if the case headed to court it would request copies of any private messages sent by Meghan to her friends in which she authorises them to speak to the media on her on behalf, potentially prompting further embarrassment.
Meghan’s legal team at the reputation management specialists. Schillings have alreadyconfirmed that she kept a copy of the letter after writing it in hand, before sending it to her Los Angeles representatives to pass to her father. The royal has pledged to give any damages from the case to charity.
Prince Harry is separately suing the publishers of the Sun and the Mirrorover allegations of historic phone hacking.
(************************************ (************************************** (Read More) (****************************************
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings