Tuesday , October 20 2020

Meghan Markle’s father’s could give evidence against her ’in newspaper legal case – The Independent, Independent


    

             

                                   

                                                                         

The estranged father ofMeghan Marklecould give evidence against her in court, according to reports.

                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Thomas Markle has agreed to be a witness for theMail on Sundayafter the Duchess of Sussex launched legal action against the newspaper, according to its sister publication, theDaily Mail.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

The case centers on theMail‘s decision to publish extracts of a personal letter which Meghan sent to her father in August (**********************************************************************, Prince Harry, Prince Harry.

                                                                                                                                                                                             

  Download the new Independent Premium app  

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

                               

Her lawyers Schillings argue the paper “intentionally distorted or manipulated” the letter’s context in an effort to portray Meghan “negatively” and allege misuse of private information, infringement of copyright and breach of the Data Protection Act (***********************************************************************.                                                                                                                                                                                                         

However theMail on Sundayrejects the claims and argues there is “huge and legitimate public interest” in the personal relationships of members of the royal family, according toHigh Courtdocuments seen by the BBC.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

    

        

leftCreated with Sketch.<defs><defs>****************************************************<feoffset dx="0" dy="1" in="SourceAlpha" result="shadowOffsetOuter1"><fegaussianblur in="shadowOffsetOuter1" result="shadowBlurOuter1" stddeviation="1.5">**************************************</fegaussianblur></feoffset></defs><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/PrinceHarry" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/PrinceHarry">**************************<g fill-rule="nonzero" id="Shape">(****************************************** (****************************************** ( (******************************************<a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/PrinceHarry" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/PrinceHarry">********************************** (********************************************         </a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">****************** (right) ****************** (Created with Sketch.) <span on="tap:gallery-lightbox-7698921" role="button" tabindex=""><span on="tap:gallery-lightbox-7698921" role="button" tabindex="">********************** () ****************************************** (<desc>) ****************************** (************************************<g fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd" id="Gallery" stroke="none" stroke-width="1"></g></desc></span>(************************************** (**************************************<use fill="black" fill-opacity="1" filter="url(#filter-2)" xlink:href="#path-1">(****************************************<use fill="#FFFFFF" fill-rule="evenodd" xlink:href="#path-1"><use fill="#FFFFFF" fill-rule="evenodd" xlink:href="#path-1"></use></use></use></span></a></g><g id="Gallery_Expanded" transform="translate(-1032.000000, -437.000000)">    </p> <div>                                                                                                                         <a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court"></a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court"></p> <p>The paper’s legal defense claims that Meghan and other royals “rely on publicity about themselves and their lives to maintain the privileged positions they hold”.</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                             </p> <p>On Tuesday night<em>The Daily Mail</em>reported Mr Markle, (****************************************************************************************, had handed over ”previously unseen messages and letters” to bolster the defense to the legal claim.</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                     </p> <p>If the case goes before a High Court judge, “it could lead to the prospect of Meghan coming face-to-face with her father in the High Court,” the newspaper added.</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                         </p> <p>Mr Markle became a controversial figure during the build-up to the royal wedding after he allegedly staged paparazzi photographs of himself and repeatedly talked to journalists about his contact with his daughter.</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                     </p> <p>In one extract from the letter published by the<em>Mail on Sunday</em>, the duchess wrote: “Your actions have broken my heart into a million pieces – not simply because you have manufactured such unnecessary and unwarranted pain, but by making the choice to not tell the truth as you are puppeteered in this. Something I will never understand. ”</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                      </p> <div id="newsletter-component">    </p> <p>Only the best news in (your inbox) ********************************************</p> <p>  <span>  <a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">                                                                                  </p> <p>In October Prince Harry said in a statement that he and his wife had been driven to take legal action against the newspaper by the “painful” impact of “relentless propaganda”.</p> <p>                                                                                                                                                                                                     </p> <p>Referencing press coverage of his mother Princess Diana, the duke said his “deepest fear is history repeating itself”.</p> <p>                                                                                                                     </p> <p>On Monday the Queen agreed Prince Harry and Meghan could step back as senior royals and begin a “new life” as an “independent” family.</p> <p>                                                                                                                     </p> <p><em>Additional reporting by Press Association<em></em></em></p> <p>                                                                                                                                         </a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">                                                                                                                                                                                               <span>                        <a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">               </a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">  </a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/high-court" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/high-court">************************************<defs>**********************************</defs></a>(******************************************** Read More</span></a><a href="https://payeer.com/01575879" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a><a data-vars-event-id="c6" data-vars-item-name="BL-9284001-/topic/mail-on-sunday" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/topic/mail-on-sunday"></a></span></div> <p></a></div> <p></g></a></defs>

About admin

Check Also

Azerbaijan and Armenia agree to a pause in fighting – CNN, CNN

Azerbaijan and Armenia agree to a pause in fighting – CNN, CNN

(CNN)Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed to a "humanitarian ceasefire" in the conflict over the contested enclave of Nagorno Karabakh on Saturday -- one week after truce brokered by Russia fell apart, according to a statement from the foreign ministries of both countries.The new agreement -- set to start at midnight local time (4 p.m. ET Saturday)…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *