in ,

Researchers hack Siri, Alexa, and Google Home by shining lasers at them, Ars Technica

Researchers hack Siri, Alexa, and Google Home by shining lasers at them, Ars Technica




MEMS mics respond to light as if it were sound. No one knows precisely why.





Researchers hack Siri, Alexa, and Google Home by shining lasers at them

Sugawara et al.

Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant are vulnerable to attacks that use lasers to inject inaudible — and sometimes invisible — commands into the devices and surreptitiously cause them to unlock doors, visit websites , and locate, unlock, and start vehicles, researchers report in a research paper published on Monday. Dubbed Light Commands, the attack works against Facebook Portal and a variety of phones.

Shining a low-powered laser into these voice-activated systems allows attackers to inject commands of their choice from as far away as (feet) 110 m ). Because voice-controlled systems often don’t require users to authenticate themselves, the attack can frequently be carried out without the need of a password or PIN. Even when the systems require authentication for certain actions, it may be feasible to brute force the PIN, since many devices don’t limit the number of guesses a user can make. Among other things, light-based commands can be sent from one building to another and penetrate glass when a vulnerable device is kept near a closed window.

The attack exploits a vulnerability in microphones that usemicro-electro-mechanical systems, or MEMS. The microscopic MEMS components of these microphones unintentionally respond to light as if it were sound. While the researchers tested only Siri, Alexa, Google Assistant, Facebook Portal, and a small number of tablets and phones, the researchers believe all devices that use MEMS microphones are susceptible to Light Commands attacks.

A novel mode of attack

The laser-based attacks have several limitations. For one, the attacker must have directline of sightto the targeted device. And for another, the light in many cases must be precisely aimed at a very specific part of the microphone. Except in cases where an attacker uses an infrared laser, the lights are also easy to see by someone who is close by and has line of sight of the device. What’s more, devices typically respond with voice and visual cues when executing a command, a feature that would alert users within earshot of the device.

Despite those constraints, the findings are important for a host of reasons. Not only does the research present a novel mode of attack against voice-controllable, or VC, systems, it also shows how to carry out the attacks in semi-realistic environments. Additionally, the researchers still don’t fully understand the physics behind their exploit. A better understanding in the coming years may yield more effective attacks. Last, the research highlights the risks that result when VC devices, and the peripherals they connect to, carry out sensitive commands without requiring a password or PIN.

“We find that VC systems are often lacking user authentication mechanisms, or if the mechanisms are present, they are incorrectly implemented ( eg, allowing for PIN bruteforcing), ”the researchers wrote in a paper titledLight Commands: Laser-Based Audio Injection Attacks on Voice-Controllable Systems. “We show how an attacker can use light-injected voice commands to unlock the target’s smart-lock protected front door, open garage doors, shop on e-commerce websites at the target’s expense, or even locate, unlock and start various vehicles (eg , Tesla and Ford) if the vehicles are connected to the target’s Google account. ”

Below is a video explaining the Light Commands attack:

LightCommands v3 2

Low cost, low power requirements

The paper describes different setups used to carry out the attacks. One is composed of a simple laser pointer (price $ 18 for three), aWavelength Electronics LD5CHAlaser driver ($ 339), and aNeoteck NTK 059audio amplifier ($ 27. 99). The setup can use an optionalOpteka 650 – (mm) ************ (telephoto lens) $ 199. 95) to focus the laser for long-range attacks.

Light Commands demo with inexpensive setup.

Another setup used an infrared laser that’s invisible to the human eye for more stealthy attacks . A third setup relied on anAcebeam W 30 500 lumenslaser-excited phosphor flashlight to eliminate the requirement to precisely aim a light on a specific part of a MEMS microphone.

One of the researchers’ attacks successfully injected a command through a glass window 230 feet away. In that experiment, a VC device was positioned next to a window on the fourth floor of a building, or about 50 feet above the ground. The attacker’s laser was placed on a platform inside a nearby bell tower, located about 141 feet above ground level. The laser then shined a light onto the Google Home device, which has only top-facing microphones.

A diagram of the building-to-building attack using Light Commands.

Enlarge/A diagram of the building-to-building attack using Light Commands.

Sugawara et al.

Building-to-building Light Commands attack.

In a different experiment, the researchers used a telephoto lens to focus the laser to successfully attack a VC device 360 feet away. The distance was the maximum allowed in the test environment, raising the possibility that longer distances are possible.

Light Commands in a corridor.



Brave Browser
(Read More) ************


What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Fortnite pastoral, Hacker News

Fortnite pastoral, Hacker News

Splatter master Jackson Pollock avoided “coiling” when creating his paintings, Ars Technica

Splatter master Jackson Pollock avoided “coiling” when creating his paintings, Ars Technica