Jasper Jolly
The Bank of England’searly-access breach has broader implications for the new governor’s role, according to former rate-setter Andrew Sentance .
Successive governors have taken on greater and greater responsibilities. These range from dealing with intense scrutiny over every word in market-sensitive interest rate announcements to running a large organization with significant security duties.
Sentance told us that Mark Carney’s replacement, due to be announced soon, should change tack:
**************
“One of the weaknesses of the Bank’s organization is too much power is concentrated in the governor.
“If I was making a recommendation it would be to act more as a chairman and less as a chief executive.”
The Bank only appointed its first chief operating officer in 2012 to look after the day-to-day running of the Threadneedle Street headquarters and its various regional outposts, but the governor still has overarching responsibility.
Economic responsibilities were formerly more spread between the nine members of the monetary policy committee. When he was chief economist Mervyn King answered most of the monetary policy questions, but he did not then relinquish that responsibility, setting a precedent for the governor to be the public figurehead.
The number of deputy governors has increased to four, but the governor has nevertheless ended up with more work, Sentance added.
**************
“The productivity of deputy governors has not been a good lead to the economy.”
Here’s our news story on this morning’s retail sales shocker: (********************************** 5). ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** amEST(********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************: **********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
on Sweden’s interest rate
**************
Sweden’s central bank, one of the pioneers in wielding negative interest rates, became the first to end that policy Thursday, a move closely watched by other institutions that have resorted to what was supposed to be a radical and short-lived measure.
In 2020, the Riksbank, the world’s oldest central bank, became the first to charge commercial banks to hold deposits rather than pay them interest. In 2019, it lowered its key policy rate below zero
, following a similar move by the European Central Bank the year before.
On Thursday, the Riksbank raised the key rate to zero from minus 0. (***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************%. The bank moved because a majority of its policy makers expect inflation to be close to its 2% target over the coming years. But it signaled caution, indicating it has no plans to raise its key rate further in the coming year.
The WSJalso points outthat two Riksbank policymakers, Anna Breman and Per Jansson —opposed the move. They wanted to wait for more proof that inflation was on target.
(************************************** 4.) ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** (am) ************ (EST) ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************: 83
UK retail sales hit – month low
Retail sales fell by 0.6% month-on-month in November, the Office for National Statistics reports. That’s much worse than expected.
This dragged annual retail sales growth down to just 1% last month, from 3.1% in October. That’s the weakest since April 2020.
Looking at the last quarter, sales are down 0.4% – again, the worst reading in (months.) (***********************Rupert Seggins(@ Rupert_Seggins)UK retail sales volumes down -0.4% q / q in the 3 months to November. Corresponds to a retail sector drag on GDP growth of c. -0. 04% q / q. Non-store retailing, which is primarily internet retailers, saw a fall of -2.5% q / q. Growth for food (0.5% q / q) & household goods stores (0.6% q / q). pic.twitter.com/5ZIhvrpcke***************** (December) ,
However ….. the ONS’s reporting period does not actually cover Black Friday (which fell on
********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** (th November), so it has adjusted the data to address that.
Updatedat 5. am EST
Andrew Sentance, a former Bank of England policymaker, says
Sentance, who is now senior adviser to Cambridge Econometrics, told us the Bank faces a lot of serious questions:
**************
“Central banks pride themselves on confidentiality and making sure communication is well managed.
There has been an abuse of information here. The question in your mind will be, if this happened what else has happened? Are the Bank’s communications secure? ”
Significantly, the Riksbank is ending negative interest rates while still continuing its asset-purchase program (buying bonds with new money to stimulate growth).
Other banks have suggested that they’d work the other way – ending QE before risking higher borrowing costs. Clearly the Riksbank felt negative interest rates were too painful to persist with.
Simon Harvey of Monex Europe has tweeted about this: (December) ,
(**********************************************************Simon Harvey(@_ SimonHarvey)Forward guidance of the repo rate suggests 0% is here to stay over the coming years, however. Risks remain in the current global climate for another cut but the nature of this hike suggests the threshold to re-enter negative territory is much higher than previous. [3] (December) ****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************,
********(3) ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** (amEST: 39Sweden ends negative interest rates (****************************************************************************************************************
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings