abstract . The vast amount of product information available to consumers through online search renders most advertising obsolete as a tool for conveying product information. Advertising It remains useful to firms only as a tool for persuading consumers to purchase advertised products. In the mid-twentieth century, courts applying the antitrust laws held that such persuasive advertising is anticompetitive and harmful to consumers, but the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was unable to pursue an antitrust campaign against persuasive advertising for fear of depriving consumers of advertising’s information value. Now that the information function of most advertising is obsolete, the FTC should renew its campaign against persuasive advertising by treating all advertising beyond the minimum required to ensure that product information is available to online searchers as monopolization in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act.
author. Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky College of Law. Tien Quoc Du Nguyen, F.M. Scherer, Sandeep Vaheesan, numerous colleagues at the University of Kentucky College of Law, and participants in two meetings, the 4th Tilburg Law and Economics Center Workshop on Competition Policy and Regulation in Media and Telecommunications, and the 2020 American Business Law Journal Invited Scholars Colloquium, provided helpful comments.
Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus (Covid – )
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings