The US won't run out of food during the coronavirus pandemic – Vox.com, Vox.com
1.9k Views
Why shoppers don’t need to panic-buy at the supermarket.
While grocery stores have been facing disruptions due to coronavirus, the US food supply remains robust. Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
As the pandemic began, Americans lined up by the hundreds to (panic buy
staples like – pound bags of rice and peanut butter at Costco. Shelf-stable, freeze-dried provisions normally marketed to campers and doomsday survivalists flew off the shelves at outdoor companies. People continue to purchase and hoard so much food that even local food banks are having trouble sourcing items from grocery stores.
But experts say that the US food supply remains robust despite disruptions caused by coronavirus.
That doesn’t mean that a shopper will be able to walk into any supermarket at any time of day and find the items they’re looking for. Grocery stores have been facing spot shortages between restocking, which occurs overnight, so people might have better luck in finding what they need if they shop in the morning.
Still, the US Department of Agriculture hasn’t seen any nationwide shortages of food, an agency spokesperson told Vox.
“I want to assure you that American food supply is strong, resilient, and safe , ”Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue said in a press conference at the White House on Wednesday. “In the United States, we have plenty of food for all of our citizens.”
The food supply chain – the system that takes our food from farm to fork through production, processing, distribution and consumption – is designed to be nimble. It’s largely self-sufficient: Most of what Americans eat comes from American growers, brokers, factories, warehouses and distribution centers and is shipped on American trucks. Food production is also spread out across the country, meaning that crises in any one area won’t cripple the system. And many sectors don’t, for the most part, require intensive human labor, instead employing industrial-scale machinery.
Still ,
some food industries aren’t hurting from the current crisis. Some meatpacking plants have shut down. Farmers are struggling to find buyers for their produce. The price of corn has plummeted, which could put some farms out of business and have a ripple effect on other food industries.
But the most pressing challenge lies not with America’s farmers, but with the supply chain itself. The supply chain has already had to adapt to America’s changing eating habits amid the pandemic – now, consumers are almost entirely dependent on supermarkets, rather than restaurants and the food service sector. The supply chain is still catching up to this sudden shift in demand, but most experts are optimistic that it can adapt.
The question, in other words, isn’t whether there will be enough food. It’s whether that food will end up where consumers can actually buy it.
“We admire the way that the system works, ”Yossi Sheffi, a supply chain expert and the director of MIT’s Center for
Transportation and Logistics
, told Vox. “The virus is still moving from state to state and it’s not uniform all over the country, so the demand patterns are changing all the time. But at the end of the day, we don’t see it as a real danger that we will run out of food. ”
There could be spot shortages of certain meats. The meat aisle in the grocery. store might have some bare spots.
Few food businesses have been harder hit by coronavirus than meat processing plants, where livestock are typically slaughtered, hung up to bleed out, cut up into pieces, deboned and packaged for sale. There have been hundreds of reported coronavirus cases at processing plants across the country, from
Colorado to Pennsylvania, and some plants have been forced to close – including Smithfield’s Sioux Falls, South Dakota, facility, which is now the largest coronavirus hot spot in the country.
The workers in These plants are often low-income – one Smithfield employee reported making $ . an hour, though workers have been offered a ($) bonus if they don’t miss any shifts in April. Their work is physically taxing even in the best of times as they lift and slice through heavy cuts of meat. Now, it’s also potentially life-threatening: one – year-old Smithfield worker reportedly died
after contracting the virus.
more than workers at Smithfield Foods’ pork processing plant in South Dakota have confirmed cases of the coronavirus. One worker died after contracting the virus. Stephen Groves / AP
The rapid spread of coronavirus through meat processing plants is particularly concerned given that, even under normal circumstances, these kinds of facilities are highly sanitized and contained due to federal requirements for pathogen control and food safety. Julie Anna Potts, President and CEO of the North American Meat Institute, said there is complete disinfection of the facilities every night after the last shift. Workers have to wear hard hats, safety goggles, frocks and boots.
Now, they’re also wearing masks and face shields, when the plants can get ahold of them, and they have been practicing social distancing where possible in cafeterias and places where the workers put their protective equipment on. But on the processing floor, they’re standing shoulder-to-shoulder.
The plants are doing everything in their power to diminish the spread of the virus and stay open in order to support the food supply, so the onus now falls on local officials to better enforce social distancing in the communities outside the plants, Potts said.
The plant closures have a ripple effect on the whole meat supply chain. Farmers raise hogs, for example, to reach a specific weight and, when they’re market-ready, they leave the barns for slaughter, with other pigs are right behind them. There’s little room for error because farmers can’t hold them in feed lots or in pasture like cattle.
Livestock farmers, therefore, depend on processors to stay operational.
“The animals don’t stop growing,” Potts said. “They need a place to go, and our facilities are where they go in the normal course of things.”
Due to plant closures, farmers are now stuck with livestock they can’t sell. That’s already caused livestock prices to drop precipitously – even though the price of processed meat has gone up. Trade groups estimate the consequent losses at ($) .6 billion
for the cattle industry and
$ 5 billion
for the hog industry, and they’re calling on the Trump administration to deliver additional aid. Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie has
warned
that it may force farmers to resort to extreme measures to deal with the surplus.
“I’m afraid you’re going to see… cattle and hogs being euthanized or incinerated and buried while we have shortages at the supermarket,” he said.
However, the National Pork Board, the industry group for pork farmers, told NPR that euthanasia would be an “absolute last, last choice for anyone.”
In addition to plant closures, beef and cattle farmers are also bracing for potential feed shortages Feed usually includes what’s called “dried distillers grains,” a byproduct of ethanol production. That ingredient is suddenly in short supply because production of ethanol, a component of most gasoline sold in the US, has slowed as Americans have been ordered to stay at home. That means some livestock producers won’t be able to send their animals to the slaughterhouse on time and might be looking to slow down their feeding rates.
In Florida, zucchini, cabbage, tomatoes and green beans have been left to rot
in the field because they can no longer sell to restaurants, theme parks or schools that have closed. Farmers in the state have already donated more than (one million) pounds to food banks and asked the US Department of Agriculture to buy their crops and distribute it to people in need. The state has even (launched a program aiming to connect consumers directly with farmers to buy perishable fruits and vegetables, as well as seafood, poultry and dairy. But even so, the farmers are still facing surpluses and food waste.
about farmworker safety amid the crisis, noting that they typically share tight quarters in the housing provided by employers, often crowd onto buses to commute to the fields and work in close proximity when picking, harvesting, cleaning and packing produce. Marcela Celorio, the Consul General, wrote in a Los Angeles Times Op-Ed that agricultural workers should be prioritized for coronavirus testing and have access to protective gear , as well as soap and water.
“[B] ecause of the structure of agricultural work, it is extremely difficult for the migrant population to maintain social distancing to avoid transmission of the coronavirus, ”she said. “Their current working and living conditions mean even a few infections could spread with frightening speed.” Declining corn prices could have a ripple effect Corn farmers in the Midwest and Great Plains aren’t likely to be as
affected
by possible labor shortages as other types of produce farmers because they can plant, fertilize and harvest crops with industrial-scale machinery. That also means that the prospect of coronavirus spreading on the farms themselves isn’t as likely as it would be in other agricultural industries that employ more human labor.
So far, planting season, which runs through late May, is
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings