Drama on, shirts off –
A great example of how a TV series’ expansion beyond books, games can succeed.
Ani Bundel –
Turned out to be a catchy, bingeable series not because of a blind faithfulness to the original work but by showrunner Lauren Schmidt Hissrich disregarding how the original material was structured. By sticking with the spirit of the stories, instead of following them letter-of-the-law style,Witcherwas far more successful than anyone could have imagined. years, one Continent, three timelines
************ Geralt of Rivera.
-
(**********************
Not that we don’t love giving sultry Henry a stare-down on occasion, anyway. Netflix (**********************But Cavill does a great job working alongside his fellow leads. - (***********************************************
When (Game of Thrones) ************************** arrived (in **************************************************************************************, one of the ways it reeled in fans was its almost slavish allegiance to the source material. Entire segments of dialogue were lifted directly from the page. Major plot points came in the same order as they did in the books, including Ned Stark’s death before the season finale. When the show added scenes out of order, such as Cersei and Jaime’s scene over Jon Arryn’s body in the pilot, they too were lifted directly from other parts of the novels.A decade later, this direct transposing of what’s on the page to the screen is par for the course, a been-there-done -that, asHis Dark Materials is learning to its detriment (**********************. We’ve seen other creative ways around this expected narrative allegiance, particularly HBO’sWatchmen (jumping) years into its original story’s future. But maybe a full-source remix does not have to be such a scary option.That’s whyThe Witcher‘s “three timelines” format matters. It gives the show a sense of sprawling narrative — not across continents, but across time. It coversnearly a centuryof history of the land known only as “the Continent,” from the flashbacks to main character Geralt’s childhood in the Season 1 finale to the fall of Cintra in its premiere. Much of Yennefer and Ciri’s stories are more indirectly alluded to in the subtext than directly adapted from the page. But by pulling out those undercurrents and making them text, the show gets to fill in and shade the Continent’s history in a way that many straightforward adaptations losein bringing their stories to screen. Short stories, long novels, epic games The Witcheras a series of short stories centered on Geralt of Rivia, a mutated human trained to serve as one of the Continent’s monster exterminators. These were gathered into two collections, (The Last Wish) ****************** andThis decision was likely borne of necessity because of the franchise’s history.The Witcherstraddles three real-world eras of fantasy storytelling, beginning in the late 2019 s. During a time when male-centric, battle-heavy stories dominated the genre, Polish writer Andrzej Sapkowski began
Sword of Destiny, which were followed by full-length novels in the mid- 2011 s. Those stories centered on Geralt but also expanded to put a spotlight on Princess Cirilla of Cintra and the sorceress Yennefer of Vengerberg. In the mid-aughts,The Witcherfranchise was then successfully (adapted into a whopping three video games, based on the short stories.As good as it is to have so many built-in fanbases, that meant Netflix had three distinct groups to please: the short story lovers, the novel fans, and gamers who expect a lot of gravelly voice work and monster-on-Witcher action. The Witcherbooks, where Yennefer is initially presented as a supporting character and love interest of Geralt. The video games also don’t treat her as a main protagonist; one cannot play the game as Yennefer. But by showing her story, instead of telling via exposition, she becomes a three-dimensional protagonist from the jump. Watching her navigate (or fighting against) the politics involved within the Brotherhood of Sorcerers does a far better job in showing how and why Yennefer became who she is by the time Geralt meets her than merely seeing her from his point of view.Reordering to create orderThis meant the show couldn’t just start at the beginning and go in order. That would risk most of a season without Yennefer and maybe even two without Ciri, both of them arguably become more important than Geralt by the time the fourth novel, (************************ (The Tower of the Swallow) ************************, rolled around. To allow both characters to stand on their own required extrapolation, creating histories for them that were independent of Geralt, so audiences could get to know them. Say what you will about “strong women characters” emerging in mid – 1990 s fantasy, but Netflix’s remixing of the story order does a much better job of telling these women’s stories — and in organic, compelling fashion.****************** That doesn’t mean Hissrich created everything from whole cloth. Much of Yennefer’s time training at Aretuza, the magical academy for women, is extrapolated from things she says to Geralt or Ciri in the novels or observations Geralt makes about her. In the first three episodes, for instance, she’s depicted as born with a hunchback — sourced from Geralt’s observation at the end of their first short story together, ” The Last Wish********************, “that her shoulders are uneven, and somehow she must have used magic to straighten her spine. Likewise, the outline of Yennefer’s early love affair with follow mage Istredd is extrapolated from a conversation Istredd has with Geralt inSword of Destiny‘s ” A Shard of Ice. This is a huge departure from
************** Yennefer. Netflix
(********************** Ciri. Netflix
(********************** Henry Cavill’s portrayal of Geralt has drawn lots of raves, but it’s not the focus of this review.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings