Twitter has accused theConservativesof misleading the public after they rebranded one of their official party accounts to make it look like a factchecking service during the ITV leaders’ debate.
The party waswidely criticizedon Tuesday night when it temporarily changed the name of its Conservative campaign headquarters press office Twitter account, which is followed by nearly 76, 000 users, to factcheckUK from its usual CCHQPress.
The account’s avatar was switched during the debate from the party’s logo to a white tick against a purple background, and the account was used to promote pro-Tory statements prefixed with the word “FACT”. Shortly after the debate finished, theTwitteraccount name was changed back to CCHQ Press.
On Wednesday morning, the foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, defended the move and told BBC Breakfast that “no one gives a toss about the social media cut and thrust”.
In a statement, Twitter said the Conservatives had misled the public and it would take “decisive corrective action” if a similar stunt was attempted again. “Twitter is committed to facilitating healthy debate throughout the UK general election,” said a spokesperson.
“We have global rules in place that prohibit behavior that can mislead people, including those with verified accounts. Any further attempts to mislead people by editing verified profile information – in a manner seen during the UK election debate – will result in decisive corrective action. ”
The Conservatives’ tactic was immediately criticized by the established factchecking website Full Fact, which is run by a charity. The organization said the party’s account should not be allowed to be used in this way while verified and that it had complained to Twitter.
“It is inappropriate and misleading for the Conservative press office to rename their Twitter account factcheckUK during this debate. Please do not mistake it for an independent factchecking service, ”it said.
The Labor MP David Lammy called on the Electoral Commission to investigate and punish what he called “a blatant attempt to deceive the public”.
“The Conservative party press office CCHQPress rebranding themselves as’ factcheckUK shows what disdain this party and this government has for the truth, ”he said.
In a statement, the commission said: “Voters are entitled to transparency and integrity from campaigners in the lead-up to an election, so they have the information they need to decide for themselves how to vote.
“While we do not have a role in regulating election campaign content, we repeat our call to all campaigners to undertake their vital role responsibly and to support campaigning transparency.”
The Liberal Democrat education spokesperson, Layla Moran, told BBC Radio 4’s Today program that people could easily have mistaken the Conservative Twitter account for an independent factchecker. She said she had previously found herself taken in by fake accounts.
“Twitter is fast-moving. You’re looking quickly at your feed. You tend to look at the name rather than scrutinise the handle, ”she said. Moran said she had reported the account as soon as she saw it and that it should be referred to the Electoral Commission.
On BBC Breakfast, Raab said he thought it had been very clear that the account was run by the Conservatives.
“We’ve had all sorts of nonsense thrown at the Conservatives. We’re going to be in the process – one of the things we learned from the last election – of having a really good instant rebuttal of the nonsense, ”he said.
Will Moy, the chief executive of Full Fact, said Twitter should have acted sooner and could have forcibly renamed the account.
“It was an attempt to mislead voters and I think it is inappropriate and misleading for a serious political party to behave that way,” he said. “And it’s surprising as well. Why would a self-respecting political party choose to impersonate something else to put its campaign messages out there? ”He said on Radio 4.
Speaking on the BBC’s Newsnight on Tuesday night after the leaders ’debate, the Conservative party chairman, James Cleverly, said the nature of the Twitter account was clear because its handle remained CCHQPress.
Asked whose idea it had been to change the account, he said: “The digital team have a remit. I set that remit, they work within that remit. I’m absolutely comfortable with them calling out when the Labor party put what they know to be complete fabrications in the public domain. And we will call them out every time they do it. ”