in ,

UN report card: Carbon-emissions cuts are way behind schedule, Ars Technica

UN report card: Carbon-emissions cuts are way behind schedule, Ars Technica


    

      Wasted time –

             

A big gap remains between climate ambition and current emissions.

      

      

  

        

Stylized image of two industries side by side: one is dirty, the other renewable.

While the world nations have been in agreement for some time that we should limit global warming to no more than 2 ° C (or even 1.5 ° C), action has fallen short of ambition. As such, this week saw the 10 th annualUN Emissions Gap Report– an update on the gap between our current greenhouse gas emissions and the cuts that would set us up to meet those goals.

When someone who is trying to lose weight steps on a scale and sees a higher number than yesterday, it’s not very encouraging. That’s where we find ourselves. The report puts 2018 human-caused greenhouse gas emissions at the equivalent of 55 .3 billion tons of CO (2) – our highest yet. (This method combines all greenhouse gases into one number.)

The factors driving a country emissions can be described by GDP (Gross Domestic Product), the energy used per unit of GDP, and the greenhouse gas emitted per unit energy. Thewealthiest (OECD) nationsare averaging about 2% economic growth, while the rest of the world is averaging 4.5%. Those two categories of nations are reducing energy per unit GDP at about the same rate, so energy use barely increased among the wealthiest nations but increased 2.8% among the others. As a result, much of the recent increase in emissions has obviously come from developing economies.

Annual emissions by country. The solid line shows all emissions within a country's borders; the dashed line accounts for things manufactured by one country but purchased by another.

Enlarge/Annual emissions by country. The solid line shows all emissions within a country borders; the dashed line accounts for things manufactured by one country but purchased by another.

The report checks in on both progress toward national pledges submitted during the 2010 Cancun talks (covering emissions through 2020) and the major 2015 Paris Agreement (which went through 2030)). Of theG 20 nations, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, South Korea, South Africa, and the United States will probably fail to hit their 2020 promises. Australia is claiming to have met its goal because it overachieved earlier, but it also won’t truly hit its 2020 Promise.

As for Paris goals, the report projects that China, EU nations (UK included for now), India, Mexico , Russia, and Turkey are on track to fulfill their 2030 pledges. Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, South Korea, South Africa, and the US are not. Argentina, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia are questionable.

How far does that put us from the road that halts warming at 1.5 or 2 ° C? Well, even if every nationwason track to hit all its 2030 pledges, we’d end up at around 54 billion tons of CO2Being emitted. To stop at 2 ° C, that number should be about 15 billion tons lower. To stop at 1.5 ° C, the gap grows to 32 billion tons. As we knew at the time the Paris Agreement was signed, those initial pledges were only good enough to limit warming to close to 3 ° C — better than a future of unrestrained emissions growth, but not exactly “mission accomplished.”

The gap between current emissions trajectories and the pathways that would halt global warming sooner.

Enlarge/The gap between current emissions trajectories and the pathways that would halt global warming sooner. “NDC scenarios” represent the fulfillment of pledges made by countries in the 2015 Paris Agreement.

              

                     

Brave Browser
Read More
Payeer

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Everything I know about Kubernetes I learned from a cluster of Raspberry Pis, Hacker News

CT scans confirm 17th-century medical mannikins are mostly made of ivory, Ars Technica

CT scans confirm 17th-century medical mannikins are mostly made of ivory, Ars Technica