in ,

Weighing in: Physicists cut upper limit on neutrino’s mass in half, Ars Technica

Weighing in: Physicists cut upper limit on neutrino’s mass in half, Ars Technica


    

      Mass appeal –

             

First results from the KATRIN experiment are based on just 28 days of data.

      

          –

  

        

The spectrometer for the KATRIN experiment, as it works its way through the German town of Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen in 2006 en route to the nearby Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Enlarge/The spectrometer for the KATRIN experiment, as it works its way through the German town of Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen in 2006 en route to the nearby Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Isaac AsimovdubbedNeutrinos “ghost particles.” John Updike immortalized themin verse. They’ve been the subject of several Nobel Prize citations, because these weird tiny particles just keep surprising physicists. And now we have a much better idea of ​​the upper limit of what their rest mass could be, thanks to the first results from the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino experiment (KATRIN) in Germany. Leaders from the experimentannounced their resultslast week at a scientific conference in Japan and posted (a preprint) to the physics arXiv.

“Knowing the mass of the neutrino will allow scientists to answer fundamental questions in cosmology, astrophysics, and particle physics, such as how the universe evolved or what physics exists beyond the Standard Model, “said Hamish Robertson, a KATRIN scientist and professor emeritus of physics at the University of Washington. “These findings by the KATRIN collaboration reduce the previous mass range for the neutrino by a factor of two, place more stringent criteria on what the neutrino’s mass actually is, and provide a path forward to measure its value definitively.”

The ghostly particles are devilishly hard to detect because they so rarely interact with other particles, and when they do, they only interact via the weak nuclear force. Most neutrino hunters bury their experiments deep underground, the better to cancel out noisy interference from other sources, notably the cosmic rays continually bombarding Earth’s atmosphere. The experiments usually require enormous tanks of liquid — dry-cleaning fluid, water, heavy water, mineral oil, chlorine, or gallium, for example, depending on theexperimental setup. This increases the chances of a neutrino striking one of the atoms in the medium of choice, triggering the decay process. The atom changes into a different element, emitting an electron in the process, which can be detected.

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.

Enlarge/The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Neutrinos were first proposed by Wolfgang Pauli in a 1930 letter to colleagues. He was trying to explain some baffling experimental results on radioactive beta decay in atomic nuclei, where energy appeared to be missing — something he deemed (correctly) to be impossible. He thought a new kind of subatomic particle with no charge and no mass may have carried away the missing energy; it was Enrico Fermi who later dubbed it a neutrino.

Clyde Cowan and Frederick Reines were the first to observe these ghostly particles in 1956, thanks to the fusion reactions in nuclear power plants that proliferated after World War II. Ten years later, physicists detected the first solar neutrinos from the Sun. This snagged Ray Davis Jr. and Masatoshi Koshiba aNobel Prize in 2002, shared with Riccardo Giacconi (who was honored “for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, which have led to the discovery of cosmic X-ray sources”).

The only problem was that there were far fewer solar neutrinos being detected than predicted by theory, a conundrum that became known as the solar neutrino problem. In 1962, physicists discovereda second type(“flavor “) of neutrino, the (muon neutrino) . This was followed by the discovery of a third flavor, theTau Neutrino, in 2000.

By then, physicists already suspected that neutrinos might be able to switch from one flavor to another, thanks in large part to1998 observationsby Japan’s Super-Kamiokande collaboration (Super- K).In 2002, scientists at theSudbury Neutrino Observatory(or SNO) announced they had solved the solar neutrino problem. The missing solar (electron) neutrinos were just in disguise, having changed into a different flavor on the long journey between the Sun and the Earth. SNO and Super-K shared the2015 Nobel Prize in Physicsfor theirrespective breakthroughs.

If neutrinos oscillate, then they must have a teensy bit of mass after all. AsAdrian Cho explainedin a 2016 article for Science , “Were neutrinos massless, they would have to move at light speed, at least in a vacuum, according to Einstein’s theory of relativity. If that were the case, time for them would stand still, and change would be impossible.”

But determining precisely what that mass is constitutes another knotty neutrino-related problem. There are three neutrino flavors, but none of them has a well-defined mass. Rather, different kinds of “mass states” mix together in various ways to produce electron, muon, and tau neutrinos. That’s quantum weirdness for you.

The layout and major features of the KATRIN experimental facility at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Enlarge/The layout and major features of the KATRIN experimental facility at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

KATRIN’s new results placing an upper limit for neutrino mass actually applies to the average of all three masses. The lower bound is 0. 02 eV (electron volts); neutrinos can’t have a lower mass than that. And KATRIN’s data suggests they can’t weigh more than 1 eV — or 1 / 500, (0th of the mass of the electron.)

The experiment usestritium(a highly radioactive isotope of hydrogen, with one proton and two neutrons) to generate electron-neutrino pairs: an electron and a neutrino that share 18, 650 eV of energy between them. Usually that energy is divided equally, but there are rare pairs — just a fraction of the roughly 25 billion electron-neutrino pairs produced every second — where the electron hogs nearly all of it, so there’s only a tiny amount left for the neutrino. Those pairs are the focus of KATRIN scientists. They can’t measure the neutrinos directly, so instead they subtract the electron’s energy to deduce that of the neutrino and, hence, its mass (because E=mc (2) ).

These preliminary results are based on just 28 days of data, so it doesn’t constitute a definitive measurement yet; more data is needed. But it’s already half the previous estimate of what physicists thought the upper limit on mass would be, and the actual value could be lower still. Or neutrinos could throw physicists another curveball and the additional data will yield a higher upper limit.

The experiment could also shed light on the possible existence of an exotic fourth type of neutrino, dubbed the“sterile” neutrino, that doesn’t interact with regular matter at all, apart from, perhaps, its fellow neutrinos. That would have big implications for the nature of dark matter, although despite atantalizing hintin 2018, sterile neutrinos have thus farProven elusive.

“There is indirect evidence that the neutrino masses are smaller than what KATRIN taught us last week,” André de Gouvêa, a theoretical physicist at Northwestern University who was not involved in the measurement,told Scientific American. “The indirect evidence does not replace what KATRIN can do, however, so the result in itself is very significant. Perhaps more important is that KATRIN demonstrated that things are working and that they appear to be on track to reach much further. “

                                 

                  

Brave Browser
(Read More)
Payeer

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Amazon orders 100,000 electric trucks to fight climate change, Ars Technica

Amazon orders 100,000 electric trucks to fight climate change, Ars Technica

RWAs can’t block any telecom, internet service provider: Panel – Times of India, The Times of India

RWAs can’t block any telecom, internet service provider: Panel – Times of India, The Times of India