Heritability of lifetime earnings, Hacker News

Keywords

Earnings inequalityHeritabilityTwinsGenetics

Download to read the full article text

1. Ashenfelter, O., Krueger, A .: Estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. Am. Econ. Rev.84, 1157 – 1173 (1994)Google Scholar

2. Ashenfelter, O., Rouse, C .: Income, schooling and ability: evidence from a new sample of identical twins. Q. J. Econ.113, 253 – 284 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Autor, D., Figlio, D. Karbownik, K., Roth, J., Wasserman, M., Family disadvantage and the gender gap in behavioral and educational outcomes. NBER Working Paper No. 22267 (2016)Google Scholar

3. Barnea, A., Cronqvist, H., Siegel, S .: Nature or nurture: what determines investor behavior? J. Financ. Econ.98, 583 – 604 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Behrman, S., Taubman, P .: Is schooling “mostly in the genes?” Nature-nurture decomposition using data on relatives. J. Polit. Econ.97, 1427 – 1446 (1989)Google Scholar

5. Benjamin, DJ, Cesarini , D., Chabris, CF, Glaeser, EL, Laibson, DI, Gudnason, V., Harris, TB, Launer, LJ, Purcell, S., Smith, AV, Johannesson, M., Magnusson, PKE, Beauchamp, JP , Christakis, NA, Atwood, CS, Hebert, B., Freese, J., Hauser, RM, Hauser, TS, Grankvist, A., Hultman, CM, Lichtenstein, P .: The promises a nd pitfalls of genoeconomics. Annu. Rev. Econ.4, 627 – 662 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Bertrand, M .: New perspectives on gender. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. Volume 4B, pp. 1543 – 1590. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2011)Google Scholar

7. Bingley, P., Cappelari, L., Alike in many ways: Intergenerational and sibling correlations of brothers’ earnings. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6987 (2012)Google Scholar

8. Bishop, DVM: DeFries-Fulker analysis of twin data with skewed distributions: cautions and recommendations from a study of children’s use of verb inflections. Behav. Genet.35, 479 – 490 (2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Björklund, A., Jäntti, M .: Intergenera tional income mobility and the role of family background. In: Salverda, W., Nolan, B., Smeeding, T.M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, pp. 491 – 521. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009)Google Scholar

10. Björklund, A., Jäntti, M .: How important is family background for labor-economic outcomes? Labor Econ.19, 465 – 474 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Björklund, A., Jän tti, M., Solon, G .: Influences of nature and nurture on earnings variation: a report on a study of various sibling types in Sweden. In: Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Osborne, M. (eds.) Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success, pp. 145 – 164. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 2005)Google Scholar

11. Björklund, A., Lindahl, M., Plug, E .: The origins of intergenerational associations: lessons from Swedish adoption data. Q. J. Econ.121, 999 – 1028 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Björklund, A., Jäntti, M., Solon, G., Nature and nurture in the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status: Evidence from Swedish children and their biol ogical and rearing parents. BE J. Econ. Anal. Poli .: Advances 7, Article 4 (2007)Google Scholar

13. Björklund, A., Jäntti, M., Lindquist, M .: Family background and income during the rise of the welfare state: brother correlations in income for Swedish men born 1932 – 1968. J. Public Econ.93, 671 – 680 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Björklund, A., Roine, J., Waldenström, D .: Intergenerational top income mobility in Sweden: capitalist dynasties in the land of equal opportunity? J. Public Econ.96, 474 – 484 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Black, SE, Devereux, PJ: Recent developments in in tergenerational mobility. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4B, pp. 1487 – 1541. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2011)Google Scholar

16. Böckerman, P., Viinikainen, J., Vainiomäki, J., Hintsanen, M., Pitkänen, N., Lehtimäki, T., Pehkonen, J., Rovio, S., Raitakari, O .: Stature and long-term labor market outcomes: evidence using Mendelian randomization. Econ. Hum. Biol.24, 18 – 29 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Böhlmark, A., Lindquist, M .: Life-cycle variations in the association between current and lifetime income: replication and extension for Sweden. J. Labor Econ.24, 879 – 896 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Bowles, S., Gintis, H .: The inheritance of inequality. J. Econ. Perspect.16, 3 – 30 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branigan, AR, McCallum, KJ, Freese, J .: Variation in the heritability of educational attainment: an international meta-analysis. Soc. Forces.92, 109 – 140 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. Cesarini, D., Essays on genetic variation and economic behavior. Ph.D thesis, MIT (2010)Google Scholar

20. Cesarini, D., Dawes, C., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., Wallace, B .: Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. Q. J. Econ.124, 809 – 842 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., Sandewall, Ö., Wallace, B .: Genetic variation in financia l decision making. J. Financ.65, 1725 – 1754 (2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., Turner, N .: Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. Am. Econ. Rev.104(Papers and Proceedings, 141 – 147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Lin, F., Majerovitz, J., Scuderi, B. .: Childhood environment and gender gaps in adulthood. Am. Econ. Rev.106(Papers and Proceedings, 282 – 288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Cronqvist, H., Siegel, S .: The origins of savings behavior. J. Polit. Econ.123, 123 – 169 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. DeFries, J., Fulker, D .: Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behav. Genet.15, 467 – 473 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Goldberger , A .: Heritability. Economica.46, 327 – 347 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. Goldin, C .: A grand gender convergence: its last chapter. Am. Econ. Rev.104, 1091 – 1119 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Haider, S., Solon, G .: Life-cycle  variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings. Am. Econ. Rev.96, 1308 – 1320 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. Harding, D., Jencks, C., Lopoo, LM, Mayer, SM: The changing effect of family bacground on the incomes of American adults. In: Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Osborne, M. (eds.) Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success, pp. 100 – 144. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 2005)Google Scholar

30. Heckman, J., Stixrud, J., Urzua, S .: The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. J. Labor Econ.24, 411 – 482 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. Hyytinen, A., Ilmakunnas, P., Toivanen, O .: The returns to entrepreneurship puzzle. Labor Econ.20, 57 – 67 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32. Isacsson, G .: Estimates of the return to schooling in Sweden from a large sample of twins. Labor Econ.6, – 489 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Jäntti, M., Jenkins, SP: Income mobility. In: Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2, pp. 807 – 935. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2015)Google Scholar

34. Jäntti, M., Österbacka, E ., Raaum, O., Eriksson, T., Björklund, A .: Brother correlations in earnings in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden compared to the United States. J. Popul. Econ.15, 757 – 772 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35. Johnson, W., Krueger, R.F .: Genetic effects on physical health: lower at higher income levels. Behav. Genet.35, 579 – 590 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. Kaprio, J .: The Finnish twin cohort study: an update. Twin Res. Hum. Genet.16, 157 – 162 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M .: Genetic and environmental factors in complex diseases: the older Finnish twin cohort. Twin Res.5, 358 – 365 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38. Kaprio, J. , Koskenvuo, M., Artimo, M., Sarna, S., Rantasalo, I., The Finnish twin registry: Baseline characteristics. Section I. Materials, methods, representativeness and results for variables special to twin studies. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Series M 47 (1979)Google Scholar

39. Killingsworth, MR, Heckman, JJ: Female labor supply: a survey. In: Ashenfelter, O.C., Layard, R. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, pp. 103 – 204. Amsterdam, Elsevier (1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Kohler, H., Rodgers, G .: DF-analyses of heritability with double-entry twin data: asymptotic standard errors and efficient estimation. Behav. Genet.31, 179 – 192 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41. LaBuda, MC, DeFries, JC, Fulker, DW: Multiple regression analysis of twin data obtained from selected samples. Genet. Epidemiol.3, 425 – 433 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. Landersø, R., Heckman, JJ: The Scandinavian fantasy: The sources of intergenerational mobility in Denmark and the US Scand. J. Econ.119, 178 – (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43. Lucas, REB, Pekkala Kerr, S .: Intergenerational income immobility in Finland: contrasting roles for parental earnings and family income. J. Popul. Econ.26, 1057 – 1094 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44. Manski, C .: Genes, eyeglasses, and social policy. J. Econ. Perspect.25, 83 – 94 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45. Mazumder, B .: Fortunate sons: new estimates of intergenerational mobility in the United States using social security earnings data. Rev. Econ. Stat.87, 235 – 255 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, P., Mulvey, C., Martin, N .: What do twins studies reveal about the economic returns to education? A comparison of Australian and U.S. findings. Am. Econ. Rev.85, 586 – 599 (1995)Google Scholar

46. Miller, P. , Mulvey, C., Martin, N .: Multiple regression analysis of the occupational status of twins: a comparison of economic and behavioral genetic models. Oxford B. Econ. Stat.58, 227 – 239 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Miller, P., Mulvey, C., Martin, N .: Family characteristics and the returns to schooling: evidence on gender differences from a sample of Australian twins. Economica.64, 137 – 154 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. Miller, P., Mulvey, C., Martin, N .: Genetic and environmental contributions to educational attainment in Australia. Econ. Educ. Rev.20, 211 – (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49. Miller, P., Mulvey, C., Martin, N .: The returns to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins. Labor Econ.13, 571 – 587 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. Moffitt, RA, Gottschalk, P .: Trends in the transitory variance of male earnings: methods and evidence. J. Hum. Resour.47, 204 – 236 (2012)Google Scholar

51. Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L ., Hunkin, J., Spector, T .: Is the tendency to engage in entrepreneurship genetic? Manag. Sci.54, 167 – 179 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52. Nilsen, Ø.A., Vaage, K ., Aakvik, A., Jacobsen, K .: Intergenerational earnings mobility revisited: estimates based on lifetime earnings. Scand. J. Econ.114, 1 – 23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53. Ørstavik, RE, Czajkowski, N., Røysamb, E., Knudsen, GP, Tambs, K., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T .: Sex differences in genetic and environmental influences on educational attain ment and income. Twin Res. Hum. Genet.17, 516 – 525 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54. Pekkarinen, T., Uusitalo, R., Pekkala Kerr, S .: School tracking and intergenerational income mobility: evidence from the Finnish comprehensive school reform. J. Public Econ.93, 965 – 973 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55. Piketty, T., Saez, E .: Income inequality in the United States, 1913 – 1998. Q. J. Econ.118, 1 – 41 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Plomin, R .: Commentary: why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades after. Int. J. Epidemiol.40, 582 – 592 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57. Plomin, R., Kovas, Y .: Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychol. Bull.131, 592 – 617 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58. Plomin, R., Shakeshaft, NG, McMillan, A., Trzaskowski, M .: Nature, nurture, and expertise. Intelligence.45, 46 – 59 (2014)(CrossRef) ********Google Scholar

59. Plug, E., Vijverberg, V .: Schooling, family background, and adoption: is it nature or is it nurture? J. Polit. Econ.111, 611 – 641 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60. Posthuma, D., Beem, AL, de Geus, EJC, van Baal, GCM , von Hjelmborg, JB, Iachine, I., Boomsma, DI: Theory and practice in quantitative genetics. Twin Res.6, 361 – 376 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, J., Kohler, H .: Reformulating and simplifying the DF analysis model . Behav. Genet.35, 211 – 217 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. Rodgers, J., McGue, H .: A simple algebraic demonstration of the validity of the DeFries-Fulker analysis in unselected samples with multiple kinship levels. Behav. Genet.24, 259 – 262 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62. Rodgers, J., Kohler, H., Kyvik, K., Christiansen, K .: Modeling of human fertility: findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography.38, 29 – 42 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63. Sacerdote, B .: The nature and nurture of economic outcomes. Am. Econ. Rev.92(Papers and Proceeedings, 344 – 348 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64. Sacerdote, B .: How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. Q. J. Econ.122, 119 – 157 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65. Sacerdote, B. .: Nature and nurture effects on children’s outcomes: what have we learned from studies of twins and adoptees? In: Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., Jackson, M.O. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics, pp. 1 – 30. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2011)Google Scholar

66. Schnittker, J .: Happiness and success: genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support. Am. J. Sociol.114, 233 – 259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67. Shakeshaft, NG, Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A ., Krapohl, E., Simpson, MA, Reichenberg, A., Cederlöf, M., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P., Plomin, R .: Thinking positively: the genetics of high intelligence. Intelligence.48, 123 – 132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68. Simonson, I., Sela, A .: On the heritability of consumer decision making: an exploratory approach for studying genetic effects on judgment and choice. J. Consum. Res.37, 951 – 966 ( 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69. Solon, G .: Intergenerational mobility in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter, O.C., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, pp. 1761 – 1800. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1999)Google Scholar

70. Stenberg, A .: Interpreting estimates of heritability – a note on the twin decomposition. Econ. Hum. Biol.11, 201 205 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71. Taubman, P .: The determinants of earnings: genetics, family, and other environments: a study of white male twins. Am. Econ. Rev.66, 858 – 870 (1976)Google Scholar

72. Visscher, PM, Medland, SE, Ferreira, MAR, Morley, KI, Zhu, G., Cornes, BK, Montgomery, GW , Martin, NG .: Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet.2(3), E 41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. Waller, N .: A DeFries and Fulker regression model for genetic nonadditivity. Behav. Genet.24, 149 – 153 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

© The Author (s) 2019

(Open Access) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author (s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

• Ari Hyytinen
  (1) (2)
• Pekka Ilmakunnas
  (2) (3)

  Email author

• Edvard Johansson
  (4)
• (Otto Toivanen)
  (2) (5)

1. 1.Department of EconomicsHanken School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland
2. 2.(Finland and Helsinki GSE)HelsinkiFinland

Aalto University School of BusinessEspoo(Finland)

3. 4.Faculty of Social Sciences, Business and EconomicsÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland
4. 5.Aalto University School of BusinessHelsinkiFinland