in defamation, sides Jury sides with Elon Musk in “pedo guy” defamation case, Ars Technica 1.3k Views Not liable – “I don’t want to have anything to do with this,” a juror said after the verdict. Timothy B. Lee –Dec 6, (********************************************************: (UTC UTC) ************ ************************ / Elon Musk leaves a Los Angeles federal court on Tuesday December 3 , . Apu Gomes / Getty Images**************************** (A A Los Angeles federal jury has found Elon Musk. not liable for defamation in a lawsuit brought by British caver Vernon Unsworth. Musk dubbed Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a tweet last year, but argued in court that he meant this as a generic insult — not as an accusation that Unsworth was a pedophile. “My faith in humanity is restored,” Musk reportedly saidon his way out of court. Musk and Unsworth have been trading insults since last July, when Unsworth mocked a miniature submarine (SpaceX engineers createdto help rescue a dozen boys trapped in a cave in Thailand ( it did not arrive in time to be useful). In an interview with CNN, Unsworth said that Musk should “stick his submarine where it hurts.” Musk responded with a tweet labeling Unsworth a “pedo guy” and vowing to prove that the submarine would have been able to squeeze through the narrowest passages in the cave. A month later, Musk continued to needle Unsworth. “You don’t think it’s strange he hasn’t sued me?” he Tweet in August 2019. Then Unsworth did sue him. The trial started on Tuesday with testimony from Musk. Unsworth’s comments were “an unprovoked attack on what was a good-natured attempt to help the kids,” Musk the court. “It was wrong and insulting, and so I insulted him back.” “I knew he didn’t literally mean to sodomize me with a submarine, just as I didn’t literally mean he was a pedophile, “Musk said. Unsworth’s lawyers argued that many people took Musk’s words literally, causing Unsworth “shame, mortification, worry, and distress.” But the jury found Musk’s arguments more convincing. Or perhaps they simply did not view the feud as serious enough to warrant cash damages. “It was very clear,” one juror said, according to Buzzfeed reporter Ryan Mac. “I don’t want to have anything to do with this,”another added. ****************************************************************** (Read More) ************ See more Previous article On the day of a key test, Russia trolls Boeing's Starliner mission, Ars Technica Next article Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict failure of justice, say fresh review pleas – Hindustan Times, Hindustantimes.com What do you think? 0 Points Upvote Downvote Leave a ReplyCancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. * Post Comment Reply with GIF GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings
Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict failure of justice, say fresh review pleas – Hindustan Times, Hindustantimes.com
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings